- DOC Access Act reintroduced amid growing Capitol Hill vigor for VBM reform
- U.S. House, Senate approve VA OD physician-level recognition legislation
- Citing array of concerns and complaints, Congress ramps up scrutiny of vision benefit manager industry
- AOA-PAC Election Report: Optometry Has Outsized Impact on 2024 Elections
- How the AOA and affiliates are fighting for reimbursement and coverage fairness
- Are you ready for the Eyeglass Rule of 2024?
- NIH, NEI consolidation plan ‘jeopardizes’ vision research, draws AOA opposition
- Bill seeks better fix to Medicare Physician Fee Schedule cuts
- How Chevron ruling could impact optometry
- Takeaways from CMS’ proposed 2025 Physician Fee Schedule
- FTC issues 10-year Eyeglass Rule update as AOA renews demand for crackdown on medical device scammers
- AOA joins other groups seeking Supreme Court reversal of decision favoring ERISA authority
- AOA sees positives in federal children’s eye health legislation
- CMS heeds AOA recommendations on Medicare supplemental benefits
- 'All the advocacy firepower’ called up at AOA on Capitol Hill
- What optometry’s advocates are championing at AOA on Capitol Hill
- Capitol Hill inquiries into plan abuses are expanding
- Vision plan abuses top of mind? Register for AOA’s town hall on reimbursement, coverage fairness advocacy
- 15 advocacy highlights of 2023
- CMS takes aim at Medicare Advantage plans misrepresenting vision benefits
- Fighting for veterans, fighting for optometry
- AOA: No letting up on Eyeglass Rule advocacy
- A force to reckon with
- U.S. House investigative committee calls for scrutiny of vision plans
- Retail optical lobbying group name change allays AOA, affiliate concerns
- Doctors of optometry challenge reasoning behind proposed Eyeglass Rule changes at FTC workshop
- Contact lens safety legislation proposes banning robocalls
- Help voice optometry’s priorities at AOA on Capitol Hill: Here’s how
- Part of the solution: Optometry groups join AOA in submitting actionable solutions for workforce shortages
- Hatch Act permits issue advocacy by doctors of optometry
- AOA makes robust rebuttal to FTC over proposed changes to Eyeglass Rule
- DOC Access Act introduced amid growing patient calls for Congress to act
- bill seeks advancement for VA doctors of optometry
- Are you adhering to the Contact Lens Rule
- AOA decries misleading Medicare Advantage advertising
- Gaining access A win for veterans and doctors of optometry
- Congress heeds AOA’s call to stop Medicare pay cuts, but lawmakers’ plan falls short
- Proactive advocacy gets early eyeglass rule gains, notice of potential new burden
- AOA PAC plays outsized role in 2022 midterm elections
- Veterans notch win as VA rescinds restrictive language governing community ODs
- Supporting Medicare Providers Act
- Federal student loan forgiveness: What to know
- Medicare Pay Cuts 2022
- 2022 Capitol Hill Recap
- AOA and South Carolina doctors expose and defeat retail lobby group’s influence scheme
- Medicare Pay Cuts March 2022
- Hold Medicare Advantage plans accountable
- Hubble Contacts slapped with 3.5 million penalties restrictions and supervision
- Medicare pay cuts, once delayed, looming without Congressional action
- Bipartisan AOA-backed bill targeting abusive discount plans gets boost from policy-expert report delivered to Congress
- Advocacy in optometry
- U.S. House, consumer groups mull federal action against DTC contact lens sales schemes
- Medicare Cuts Averted
- Medicare vision efforts fizzle 10 percent pay cuts still loom
- Optometry’s advocates going FAR beyond the call
- Lawmakers host AOA, patient and consumer advocates for VBM abuse briefing as Congress expands probes
- AOA-AFOS make case to Department of Veterans Affairs for access-boosting national practice standards
- Medicare expansion: The long road to here and now
- House pens Medicare vision benefits
- Congress sets deadline to ink Medicare vision expansion language
- White House extends student loan relief, AOA continues push for NHSC inclusion
- 4 questions about Medicare vision expansion answered
- AOA, AFOS work to ensure optometry well represented in formation of national practice standards by Veterans Affairs
- Medicare expansion
- Congress urges administration to fully implement provider nondiscrimination law
- Department of Veterans Affairs Optometry Service and doctors of optometry
- Medicare Vision Expansion
- AOA-backed DOC Access Act reintroduced to combat anti-competitive vision plans
- 2021 Virtual AOA on Capitol Hill Wrap-up
- Contact lens prescription verification failings targeted by new legislation
- Advocacy Bootcamp
- Medicare Telehealth Expansion
- 2 percent Medicare sequester delayed
- Doctors of optometry obtain 2.1 billion in federal relief
- CL rule takes effect
- Medicare Sequester
- Expanded COVID-19 vaccinator workforce includes doctors and students of optometry
- NBEO decisions provoke AOA-AOSA response
- Congress’ COVID-19 relief package HHS funds-ERC extension
- Why staff involvement is critical
- 2021 Virtual AOA on Capitol Hill
- Ohio activates eligible doctors for COVID-19 vaccine administration AOA focuses new relief efforts
- Congress President Biden asked to activate optometry for COVID-19 vaccination response
- AOA- AOSA-backed federal student loan relief extended through September
- AOA takes on anti-optometry lobbying group’s deceptions
- Contact Lens Rule implications key tax and Medicare pay fixes among AOA wins
- AOA and AOSA make appeal to extend suspension of student loan payments
- AOA-backed DOC Access Act gains U.S. Senate companion
- Contact Lens Rule bill gains backing
- Contact Lens Rule changes take effect Oct 16
- 1-800 Contacts notifies patients not to wear AquaSoft lenses due to lens defect
- Contact Lens Rule Modernization Act introduced in the U.S. Senate
- Virtual AOA on Capitol Hill Recap
- Championing paraoptometrics
- Virtual AOA on Capitol Hill 2020
- AOA doctors warn FTC of potential adverse impact of new amendment
- Concerns as optometry students prepare for boards
- Elevating optometry through media advocacy
- AOA finds allies in fight against new FTC contact lens prescription paperwork mandate
- Proposed payment model would have put burden solely on shoulders of doctors of optometry
- Optometry help divert emergent eye cases from ER COVID-19
- Medicaid CHIP relief funds
- AOA address increased cost personal protective equipment
- AOA and state affiliates put optometry's concerns front and center in Washington
- AOA petitions NAVCP member plans temporary relief during emergency
- Pandemic relief bill will help optometry practices nationwide
- AOA mobilizes for doctors in national response to pandemic
- AOA assembles industry leaders set future guidance telehealth services
- AOA secures legislative win provides direction Medicare telehealth services
- AOA calls for FDA investigation into retailers remote vision test
- How and why you should get involved in advocacy
- AOA ensures Medicare legislation recognizes eye exams
- reauthorization of higher education act
- Legislation targets contact lens prescription verification shortcomings
- DOC Access Act fights harmful vision plan abuses
- AOA on Capitol Hill 2019
- The big picture
- AOAs advocacy at top of their game
- Tusculum denied optometry program by institutional accreditor
- Remembering John McCain
- Tusculum media campaign prompts AOA insistence on accreditation standards
- FTC offers revised Contact Lens Rule
- 2018 AOA on Capitol Hill makes history
- AOA on Capitol Hill 2018
- FTC contact lens paperwork proposal update
- FTC workshop wrapup
- Californias congressional delegation joins bi-partisan call to stop FTC paperwork proposal
- Every doc has their day—on the Hill
- FTC Contact Lens Workshop
- DOCACCESS
- FTC Contact Lens Rule Workshop
- Tax Reform Passes
- Scam Alerts
- Better Care Reconciliation Act
- AOAs 247 advocacy is shaping news coverage
- AOA and GOA backed bill take aim at antipatient anticompetitive abuses
- AOA launches Health Policy Institute
- AOA alerts states to NAVCP backed noncovered services bill
- Senate VA chairman deals blow to TECS program
- AOAs patient safeguards reflected in final Cures Bill
- Fullcourt press AOAs 2016 advocacy highlights
- Proposed Contact Lens Rule misguided
- 3 ways to be an all star advocate
- AOA-PAC chair talks importance of contributions
- FTC proposes Contact Lens Rule changes
- AOAs privacy appeal prompts change
- AOA calls for federal investigation
- Bill seeks 90 day EHR reporting period
- Advocates urge federal action against contact lens resellers
- FTC issues warning letters related to Contact Lens Rule
- Recess over Congress considers AOA backed bills
- AOA president stands up for ODs and patients at Senate hearing
- Truth in Healthcare Marketing
- Vision Quest
- AOA provides model legislation to fight forced discounts
- Day of action Grow support for DOC Access Act
- letter from the president prioritizing optometry
- Rumors of meaningful uses demise have been greatly exaggerated
- Year end legislation advances AOA priorities
- Contact lens care guides scrutinized by FDA panel
- AOA-backed legislation aims to boost eye exams among seniors with diabetes
- 3 tips for becoming an AOA keyperson
- Lobbyists hired to oppose AOA ADA backed DOC Access Act
- AOA calls for antitrust protection before Supreme Court case
- New legislation would provide more flexibility in EHR incentive programs
- AOA defends doctors against new attack on Harkin law
- doctors of optometry score win on prescribing law
- AOA submits comments on FTC Contact Lens Eyeglasses rules
- FTC seeks feedback on Contact Lens and Eyeglasses rules
- Rethinking eye health and vision care
- Optometrys advocates mobilize during Congressional recess
- AOA steps up efforts to guide NAM vision study
- AOA advocacy helps avert Medicare cuts in trade bill
- Supreme Court dismisses ACA challenge AOA backed provisions remain in full effect
- AOA lobbies for changes in EHR Incentive Programs
- HHS reverses course on Harkin Law guidance
- AOA advocacy helps shape Cures Act
- Medicare seniors deserve better coverage for eye care
- Optometry takes Capitol Hill
- CMS proposes shorter meaningful use reporting periods
- What you need to know about MACRA the new Medicare pay reform law
- AOA continues fight to improve meaningful use in 2015
- CMS to ease meaningful use reporting periods
- AOA Contact Lens watchdog group to track report illegal contact lens sales
- How to engage with local elected officials
- Medicare payments increase by 75 percent in 10 years
- AOA urges members to lobby for loan repayment bill at CAC
- Congress spending bill addresses optometrys priorities
- Doctors of optometry step up as pandemic sets in
- Medicare pay cuts loom without Congress action
AOA and AFOS: ‘Cut through the noise’ and empower licensed doctors of optometry to provide greater access to care to veterans
September 21, 2023
Eye care is the third-most requested health service by veterans at the VA—and doctors of optometry provide the majority of that care. Yet, as the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) considers new national standards of practice for more than 50 health professions at its facilities, optometrists are making a winning case for expanding their role at an understaffed VA and are galvanizing against baseless attacks from organized medicine, ophthalmology and a few unbending legislators.
Tag(s): Advocacy, Federal Advocacy
Call it a tour de force for AOA and the Association of Armed Forces and Federal Optometric Services (AFOS) advocates. Between a congressional hearing Sept. 19, a meeting with lawmakers and staff from both the House and Senate Veterans Affairs Committees Wednesday, and a recent VA listening session, they are unapologetically taking their fight to every corner—to supporters and naysayers alike over the VA’s creation of new national standards of practice.
The VA’s action could transform the scope of care doctors of optometry provide there.
The standard-bearer for optometry on Sept. 19 was Paul M. Barney, O.D., who appeared at the congressional hearing in Washington D.C., by the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee Subcommittee on Health.
Dr. Barney, a member of the AOA Board of Trustees and center director for the Pacific Cataract and Laser Institute in Alaska for nearly 25 years, didn’t come alone to the hearing, called “VA’s Federal Supremacy Initiative: Putting Veterans First?”
A contingent of 20 doctors of optometry from across the country showed up, on short notice, to support Dr. Barney and the AOA’s position that the new national standards of practice should confer greater authority to optometrists to provide care based on their education, training and licensure, a win-win proposition for veterans now facing wait times and delays in VA care and doctors who would be able to practice at their highest levels.
Among the supporters in person were doctors of optometry in private practice, AFOS members, AOA Advocacy Chair William Reynolds, O.D., and three members of AOA’s Board of Trustees.
The new standards for optometry have not yet been released by the VA. But anticipated changes have drawn fire from ophthalmologists—the very first witness at the subcommittee hearing was the president of the American Medical Association Jesse Ehrenfeld, M.D. The hearing was called by U.S. Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks, R-Iowa, whose online profile states that she practiced ophthalmology prior to her election to the House.
During the hearing, Dr. Ehrenfeld called physician-led, team-based care “the gold standard of health care.” That triggered a prolonged discussion on the topic of the VA’s model of care and who should lead the team.
“The AMA strongly supports physician-led, team-based care,” Dr. Ehrenfeld said. “Nobody should be practicing in a silo.”
The physician leaders of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and the American Society of Anesthesiologists quickly agreed.
Responded the AOA’s Dr. Barney: “Yes, we support physician-led care. But, keep in mind, optometrists are physicians.”
Rep. Miller-Meeks later remarked in the hearing, apparently in response to Dr. Barney’s comment: “Doctor, be clear, I do not consider an optometrist a physician.”
Doctors of optometry have long been recognized by federal agencies as physicians. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid did so in 1986. Optometrists also are referred to as physicians under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, as they are at rural health clinics and federally qualified health centers.
Optometry and the VA’s new national standards of practice
The VA’s national standards of practice would specify what services can be performed by various professionals in the VA, such as optometrists, nurses and physical therapists. The standards would be used by the VA to modernize its electronic health record.
Further, the VA is motivated by its status as a national health system. Under the VA, as long as doctors were licensed in one state, they were able to practice in any VA facility no matter the location in the country, according to the VA. It operated this way so its professionals would not be “unduly burdened” by state requirements as they moved between VA facilities, it has said.
The VA is currently collecting comments from stakeholders on the new standards. While in Washington, AOA and AFOS met with staffers for senators who authored a bipartisan bill seeking physician-level recognition, more competitive pay and advancement opportunities for VA doctors of optometry.
“I am so proud to be a part of an organization that can come together to fight for VA optometry and help ensure our veterans get the eye care they deserve,” said Lindsay Wright, O.D., AFOS executive director.
The AOA won’t settle for less.
“We’d hope the new standards would recognize the important work that optometry provides within the VA system,” AOA President Ronald L. Benner, O.D., says. “Our doctors should be able to practice at the highest level of their education and licensure.
“Ideally the standards will say just that—VA optometrists will be allowed to treat their patients at the level granted to them by their state licensure,” Dr. Benner adds. “For those trained and licensed to do surgical procedures such as YAG, SLT and incisional procedures on the lids. Anything less than this would shortchange the VA and VA patients of necessary care and cause undue wait times and unnecessary visits for veterans.”
Optometry puts veterans first
Dr. Barney masterfully presented optometry’s argument for increasing care for services they are licensed to provide, certain office-based surgical procedures and to help relieve VA staffing shortages and reduce long waits for care for veterans.
“America’s doctors of optometry are stepping up to fill that gap,” Dr. Barney testified. “Optometry’s training and abilities have continued to advance alongside the evolution of technology. Today’s rigorous four-year optometry school curricula focuses exclusively on the study of ocular health and vision care.
“At a time when VA is struggling to meet veteran demand for eye care, it is important that VA cut through the noise and do what is right for veterans by advancing an optometry (national standards of practice) that recognizes and ensures veteran access to the full range of care, including laser eye care and other contemporary procedures, that doctors of optometry are trained, licensed and fully able to provide,” he said.
In those 10 states where doctors of optometry are authorized to use lasers to treat ocular conditions, he said, there have been “little or no patient complaints.” (A few of the speakers at the hearings inferred that veterans would be harmed by allowing optometrists to provide laser care.) Dr. Barney noted that optometrists are licensed by states, each of which sets the laws and regulations for their licensure.
Doctors of optometry provide roughly three-quarters of all eye and vision care at the VA, with optometrists often being the only eye care provider at many VA medical sites.
“… What the department decides to include or exclude from the optometry National Standards of Practice will have an outsized impact on access and timeliness of care, which will affect patient outcomes, and veteran quality of life for years to come,” Dr. Barney said, noting that the AOA’s position had the support of AMVETS, a leading veterans service organization, which it voiced at the recent VA listening session.
AMA position
Dr. Ehrenfeld, noting that “no other health care professionals come close to the education and training that physicians receive,” said the AMA opposes the VA initiative.
After attacking optometry and asserting that the AMA is an authority on health care policy issues, Dr. Ehrenfeld faced withering questions from Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wisconsin, a retired Navy SEAL and a leading advocate for veterans’ health care. Rep. Van Orden said he did not view the AMA as an unbiased authority and accused Dr. Ehrenfeld and the AMA of “playing politics with medicine. That’s not just dangerous. It’s terrifying.”
Rep. Jack Bergman, R-Michigan, a retired Marine Corps general, warned organized medicine not to focus solely on protecting their own “rice bowl,” a term he said was used in the Pentagon to denote prioritizing a specific narrow interest over the greater good.
A third lawmaker, Rep. Jen Kiggans, R-Virginia, who is a former Navy helicopter pilot and nurse practitioner, added that the AMA comments regarding the care of non-medical doctor practitioners, such as nurse practitioners, being more costly and of less quality, were wrong and "offensive to me, personally.”
Added Rep. Kiggans: “We practice differently. We just do.”
What optometry’s advocates can do
The AOA will continue working on this issue, rallying optometry’s advocates until the updated care standards are finalized and issued to health facilities, clinics and physician offices across the country.
The AOA is urging members to contact their U.S. Senator and House members regarding expanded access for America’s veterans.
For more information about the immediate outlook on Capitol Hill, please contact Matt Willette mwillette@aoa.org or Ruth Hazdovac at rhazdovac@aoa.org.
View the AOA Fact Sheet on National Standards of Practice.