Congress’ Medicare vision efforts fizzle, 10% pay cuts still loom
Congressional Democrats’ $1.75 trillion social spending plan advances without a Medicare vision benefit expansion, likely closing this chapter in a years-long saga while a trio of Medicare pay cuts still loom large on the horizon.
A scaled-back version of President Joe Biden’s Build Back Better Act—one that excludes Medicare vision (and dental) coverage expansions—cleared the U.S. House on Nov. 19 after months of negotiations that saw legislators drop the coverage proposals as cost dominated negotiations and it became clear that AOA requirements for fully funding any new benefit could not be met. The legislation now faces an equally uncertain future in Congress’ upper chamber.
Since Congress first began deliberations on a new Medicare vision benefit almost two years ago, the AOA Board of Trustees and optometry’s advocates reinforced guardrails necessary for a workable benefit should any expansion come to pass. Those provisions included:
- Ensuring any new benefit be administered directly by Medicare and not subcontracted or supplemented by vision discount plans.
- Protecting Medicare beneficiaries against unscrupulous internet sellers and others looking to game the benefit to their advantage.
- Ensuring any new benefit be adequately funded and Medicare physicians appropriately reimbursed for their time and patient care.
These guardrails reflected the vital input of AOA members nationwide, helping inform the AOA’s advocacy by way of multiple Special Advisory Committee on Medicare Expansion meetings. Ultimately, lawmakers agreed with many of the AOA’s points in their proposals for a new materials and services benefit, despite outside efforts to reshape the legislation and intrude in the doctor-patient relationship.
Robert C. Layman, O.D., AOA president, emphasized that optometry’s advocates were adamant the profession would be the ones to define how doctors of optometry practice and not others.
“In the end, the AOA’s advocacy efforts ensured there would be no compromise on how Medicare values optometric care, now and into the future, or the program’s foundational assurance of direct patient access to the doctor of optometry of their choice,” Dr. Layman says.
“As the larger bill’s price tag caused renewed debt and deficit concerns on Capitol Hill, it quickly became clear that Congress would likely be unable to deliver a fully funded benefit, and the provision was dropped entirely.”
Such is the case; the House did approve a limited hearing benefit for seniors with hearing loss. As proposed, hearing services would only be paid if the provider accepts assignment, hearing aids would only be covered once every five years per ear, and Medicare would not cover OTC hearing aids. The latter is pertinent as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently proposed a new category of OTC hearing aids for mild-to-moderate hearing loss.
The House legislation still must clear the Senate where lawmakers are expected to make changes. Senate approval is a feat that requires a united front among caucusing Senate Democrats and, as of late-October, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, remained determined to include Medicare vision and dental expansion along with the hearing provision already in this legislation.
But even as Congress’ focus presently shifts away from expanding Medicare benefits, optometry’s advocates raise concerns over another impending Medicare issue.
Medicare physicians face nearly 10% pay cuts on Jan. 1
A trio of federal spending controls jeopardize Medicare physicians’ payments by nearly 10% in 2022 without immediate Congressional action. The pay cuts—a 2% cut for Medicare sequestration, a 4% Statutory Pay-As-You-Go (PAYGO) cut and a delayed 3.75% cut outlined by the Physician Fee Schedule (PFS)—stand to hit Medicare physicians as the health care industry copes with record jobs turnover and added burdens from the public health emergency, compounded by the fact that Medicare reimbursement hasn’t kept up with inflation over the years.
“We continue to make clear to lawmakers that these cuts simply cannot happen now,” Dr. Layman says, “However, getting Congress’ attention between now and the end of the year won’t be easy.”
Prior to the Thanksgiving holiday, the AOA and other organizations representing the Patient Access to Responsible Care Alliance (PARCA) issued a letter to Congressional leadership urging immediate action to avert these payment cuts and cited the potential consequences of inaction, such as further hiring disruptions or service cuts. Additionally, the PARCA letter encouraged leaders to consider a recent letter backed by AOA and cosigned by 247 members of Congress.
Led by Reps. Ami Bera, M.D., D-California, and Larry Bucshon, M.D., R-Indiana, the Oct. 14 letter to House leadership urged immediate action in addressing these cuts and preparing reforms for the future. Notably, Reps. Bera and Bucshon successfully led a 2020 effort backed by the AOA to mitigate payment cuts that resulted in a temporary, offsetting payment increase in the Consolidated Appropriations Act.
The AOA and optometry’s advocates are calling on Congress to waive the Statutory PAYGO implications and to do so in the upcoming government funding package. Additionally, the AOA calls for an extension of the 3.75% payment adjustment as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act and an extension of the Medicare sequester moratorium at least through 2022.
Help support the AOA’s advocacy: Tell Congress to address these pay cuts
Visit the AOA’s Action Center to urge your members of Congress to immediately address all three Medicare payment cuts now targeting physicians. Or text “PAYMENT” to 855.465.5124 to access the action center.
Make an AOA-PAC donation. Use your 8-digit, AOA membership ID number and log in to make an immediate investment* to support your patients and profession. Or text “EYES” to 41444 to access the AOA-PAC page on your mobile device.
*Contributions to the AOA-PAC are for political purposes and are not tax deductible. Only AOA members and other eligible persons may contribute. Contributions will be screened and those from non-eligible persons will be returned. You have the right to refuse to contribute without fear of reprisal. You will not be advantaged or disadvantaged because of how much you give or because you do not give.
Princeton, New Jersey-based Avalon Health Economics says plans’ mandated discounts for noncovered services and materials—and limits on laboratory freedom—harmfully distort the vision care market for patients and doctors of optometry. To fight back, the AOA is mobilizing its members and other national doctor groups to educate and inform Congress, now and in lead-up to in-person AOA on Capitol Hill.
AOA President calls advocacy a “privilege” to represent the profession and doctors of optometry, as a plethora of issues are tackled in 2021 and beyond.
Lawmakers are demanding a federal study to assess the need for future legislative or regulatory action against DTC prescription medical device sellers, after the AOA and other advocates spent years citing concerns.