AOA rejects Stanton Optical demand to retract article, cites First Amendment right

April 25, 2019
The AOA is standing by a Feb. 14 article on its website, aoa.org, which reported on several citations filed by the California Board of Optometry in 2018 against the national optical chain Stanton Optical.
AOA rejects demand from Stanton Optical to retract article

The AOA is standing by a Feb. 14 article on its website, aoa.org, which reported on several citations filed by the California Board of Optometry in 2018 against the national optical chain Stanton Optical. The company is facing fines of $655,000, pending its appeal.

Within a few days of being published, a lawyer for Florida-based Stanton Optical threatened to file suit against the AOA for defamation, and the article was removed from the website pending review. After a review, the AOA informed Stanton Optical this week that the article will be reposted.

In its letter, the AOA called Stanton Optical's claims of defamation meritless and asserted that the company was mischaracterizing the article's content.

"In our opinion, this is an effort to intimidate AOA against publishing factual information that some may prefer to be forgotten, or from publishing opinions that certain people don't like," the AOA wrote in its letter. "We won't be silenced."

AOA President Samuel D. Pierce, O.D., says, "As the nation's doctors of optometry, we take seriously our responsibility to keep our members informed of developments in our industry and of potential interest to their patients. We reject Stanton Optical's characterizations of the article's content and will continue to exercise our right to freedom of speech as protected by the First Amendment."

In the article, the AOA reported on the 21 citations against Stanton Optometry brought by the board of optometry in California and currently under appeal. The alleged violations, which occurred between January 2018 and June 2018, were for:

  • Advertising for free eye examinations on its storefront signage, websites, television and/or newspapers without first obtaining an optometric license from the state board of optometry.
  • Filling prescriptions of physicians, surgeons or doctors of optometrys prior to obtaining a registration from the state. Stanton Optical was not registered (as a registered dispensing optician) to provide those services at several California locations, according to the state board of optometry.
  • Failing to submit timely renewal applications.
Related News

Online contact lens retailer, Vision Direct UK, to halt sales without required prescriptions after AOA complaints

After years of the AOA alerting the company of regulatory and legal requirements regarding contact lens sales, Vision Direct recently announced on its website that it was halting its no-prescription service.

APS welcomes Alcon, reflects on year of advocacy successes

The advocacy collaborative fighting for patient safety and the doctor-patient relationship reports on a productive 2020, despite COVID-19 challenges, and recently welcomed Alcon as its newest member.

AOA to FDA: Patients need guidance on risks of online vision apps

At Nov. 17 FDA workshop, doctors of optometry warn of a lack of communication regarding the safety of online vision tests. The AOA, which continues to educate the public on these mobile apps and to hold them accountable, offers its expertise.