- The latest on AOA contact lens advocacy
- Warby Parker slapped with $1.5 million penalty for HIPAA breach
- How AOA advocacy keeps contact lens wearers fright free
- Contacts Lens Prescription Modernization Act introduced as next step in ending damaging robocalls
- Health system optometrists strike for recognition, fair labor practices
- How AOA is keeping contact lens wearers safe this spooky season
- Constant presence: Alliance builds reputation for patient safety advocacy
- Hubble Contacts concerns grow after woman loses eye, AOA asks where’s enforcement?
- AOA Today Show Response
- AOA recommends care standard for telemedicine use amid rapid change
- AOA issues consumer health alert for online vision tests
- AOA's 31 in 31 campaign
- Vision Direct website removes FCLCA claims after AOA and BBB challenge
- Goal should be mandatory protective eyewear in high school field hockey
- Mere commoditization
- AOA pushes Amazon to sufficiently address inappropriate contact lens sales
- Vision Direct UK to halt sales without required prescriptions after AOA complaints
- Alcon joins Health Care Alliance for Patient Safety
- Patients need guidance on risks of online vision apps
- AOA demands 1-800 Contacts change misleading message
- Telemedicine-Policy
- Breaking through the pandemic
- VA rescinds laser policy
- AOA rallies optometry and allies to fight FTC contact lens rule
- Company recalls colored contact lenses it was selling online without FDA clearance
- FTC Contact Lens Rule changes
- ftc flags vision apps misleading claims
- atlantic author retracts tweet
- Homeland Security agents bust counterfeit contact lens dealers
- 1800 online eye test
- FDA enforcement action disrupts vision test company
- AOA AFOS continue fight against VA experimental eye exam replacement program
- Amazon drops noncompliant contact lens sellers
- Can you hear me now?
- AOA rejects demand from Stanton Optical to retract article
- AOA urges Federal Trade Commission to investigate Visibly ExpressExam
- FTC finds 1-800 Contacts engaged in anticompetitive agreements
- Opternatives doctor locator draws questions
- FDA warning to Opternative
- Illegal contact lens retailers slapped with fines penalties
- FDA Warning to Opternative March 18
- Holding accountable errant eye care retailers
- Hubble update
- AOA continues the fight for patient safety
- Veterans Round Table
- Balancing patient health safety with technological progress
- AOAs eye health first stance lays bare convenience messaging
- AOA contributes to CDC vision initiative
- States and AOA persevere in fight against heightened opposition from Opternative 1800Contacts
- AOA scrutiny aims to hold device profiteers accountable for false claims
- AOA promotes patient safety protections
- AOA Congress urge VA to uphold promise
- Legislation targets prescription verification deceptive internet sales tactics
- GMA Investigates raises red flag on Opternative
- Preventable vision loss unacceptable
- AOA commends FTC action against 1-800 Contacts
- AOA files expansive FDA complaint against Opternative
- Opternative issued cease and desist order
- AOA officers and CDC officials make plans for more collaboration
- Alliance for Patient Safety
- VA Visit
- AOA leaves impression on White House Conference on Aging
- FTC Upheld
- USPSTF Release
- AOA complaint focuses FDA sights on Opternative
- AOA to Census Bureau Doctor the optimal word
- Help veterans access timely quality care
- AOA Patient safety paramount in contact lens legislation
- AOA authorities target illegal contact sellers
- Legislators petition FTC on retailers unscrupulous tactics
- AOA Opternatives doc locator appears to falsely imply endorsement
- AOA complaints lead to changes in 1 800 Contacts business practice
- AOA warns public about online eye exams
- AOA affiliates continue to challenge online eye exams
- For parents, pediatric benefit brings clarity and consistency
- Be on the lookout Illegal contact lenses
- AOA fights for patient safety in contact lens legislation
- Choice Act offers new opportunities to care for veterans
- AOA backs legislative effort to expand veterans access to eye care
- AOA president to IOM Comprehensive eye exams essential to prevention and public health
- AOA in national roundtable on the future of diabetes care
- AOA Efforts on Contact Lens Bills Guided By Patient Health Concerns
Online vision test receives failing grade from doctor of optometry
October 12, 2015
Opternative’s vision test comes up short in doctor’s experience.
Tag(s): Advocacy, Patient Protection
An online vision test, which is being billed as an "eye exam" by its makers, touts ambiguous claims that could mislead patients into choosing convenience at the expense of proper eye and vision care.
Doctors don't have to look much further than one such company's homepage for an example: "Opternative is as accurate as an in-person refractive eye exam," it states. The question is—does it deliver on that assertion? Christopher S. Wolfe, O.D., AOA State Government Relations Committee member, was eager to find out.
"After Opternative made an announcement about their online vision tests, I decided to take it and see what it was all about," Dr. Wolfe says. "Once I received my prescription, I was shocked to see how different it really was."
Opternative's prescription came back OU -1.00 DS. But Dr. Wolfe's actual prescription? It's OD -0.25 D -0.75 D x 010; OS -0.25 D -1.00 D x 015. Essentially, Opternative's prescription was slightly more minus than his spherical equivalent—Dr. Wolfe's astigmatism was completely missed.
"Just to visualize how I would see out of a -1.00, I put it into a trial frame," he says. "Uncorrected visual acuity in my right eye is 20/25 and my left eye is 20/30. Through the -1.00 prescription it was almost exactly the same."
Concerned with these findings, Dr. Wolfe reviewed the clinical study that Opternative uses to back its claim comparing its vision test to an in-person refractive exam. The 30-person trial compared patients plano to -4.00 using spherical equivalent data for both exam modalities, determining a correlation.
Despite that test range, the company will assess myopic participants with spherical power between -0.25 and -5.50, hyperopic participants with spherical power between +0.25 and +2.50, and astigmatic participants with cylinder power between -0.25 and -2.50.
"There are the eye health concerns that are obviously misleading, but the fact that the study they cite is so small and their claims that it points to accuracy and correlation to traditional refraction techniques is misleading at best, since it only accounts for spherical equivalent data," Dr. Wolfe says.
Most importantly there is a significant opportunity to miss an asymptomatic patient with an eye disease via this online modality, Dr. Wolfe says. The refraction is only 1 of 12 parts of the comprehensive eye examination, and within that refraction are numerous objective and subjective measures that can't rely solely on patient responses.
But furthermore, there is potential for costing consumers more time and money. Although Opternative will recheck eyes if participants are unsatisfied with their prescriptions, the company has no way to refund the cost on eyeglasses or contacts if purchased with the wrong prescription.
AOA 'will be an advocacy force'
The AOA and state affiliates continue to safeguard consumers against the misleading claims made by online vision tests by working with the public, news media and government officials—including state legislators and attorneys general, members of Congress, and federal agencies—to highlight the dangers of separating refractive tests from annual comprehensive eye exams performed in person by an eye care professional.
Already, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has taken action against one mobile app for publicizing unsubstantiated and misleading claims about its product. Carrot Neurotechnology Inc., creator of the 'Ultimeyes' app, agreed to cease making unsupported claims that their app improved users' vision, and paid $150,000 to settle FTC charges that the company was deceiving consumers with false product claims.
The action received national news, and further underscores the work AOA and state affiliates do to bring public awareness to misleading claims made by such services.
"Wherever we find similar violations of Federal or state law, our AOA and state associations will be pressing for full enforcement," AOA President Steven A. Loomis, O.D., says. "Where laws may need to be updated to better protect the public, we will be an advocacy force."