- 650+ reasons why these powerhouse state sessions are advancing optometry
- Study: ‘Unprecedented’ optometry scope of practice expansion benefits patients
- Major victory for West Virginia patients, optometrists
- North Dakota secures telemedicine provisions, ignites grassroots advocacy
- How to build productive relationships with legislators
- Why you should fight for scope expansion
- Committee spotlight: AOA’s State Government Relations Committee
- How Arkansas’ major VBM law delivers on calls to promote fairness, doctor-patient relationships
- Texas optometrists mount defense in court and legislature of landmark law on vision plan abuses
- The case for expanding scope of optometry
- In rural America, opportunity for optometry amid shortfall of ophthalmologists
- Destination: Scope expansion
- Double duty: Doctors of optometry bring their vision to state legislatures
- 'High value' strategy sessions prep states’ advocacy
- VBM abuses scrutinized by state policy think tank, U.S. Senate opens new investigation
- AOA, affiliates’ foundational advocacy work advancing optometry
- South Carolina judge overrules Visibly challenge to consumer protection law
- Oklahoma secures optometry’s latest win over vision plan abuses
- What kind of impact is optometry making on the nation’s eye health?
- ‘Profits over patients cannot continue’ with VBMs; Texas testifies at health insurance hearing
- Kentucky attorney general holds Warby Parker accountable for its online vision test
- New York assembly bill potentially sows division in health care
- California warily watches ‘not-a-doctor’ wording in Senate bill
- Latest: Texas defends landmark vision plan law
- West Virginia adds optometric surgical procedures
- Florida optometrists quash effort—again—to pass ‘not-a-doctor’ bill
- South Dakota secures scope expansion for injections, optometric laser procedures
- Affiliates, AOA preparing for fresh attacks on optometry: 'Not-a-doctor' bills are back
- Texas vision plan law, now in effect, sees favorable development in federal lawsuit
- Proposal in Utah would restrict contact lens patient choice, disrupt doctor-patient relationship
- Affiliates, AOA share forward-thinking strategies for optometry’s advocates
- Texas’ vision plan law takes effect, court challenge continues
- Doctors of optometry in New Hampshire earn authorization to provide vaccines to public
- New Texas law halts vision plans’ anti-competitive, monopolistic behaviors
- YAG procedures by doctors of optometry, after cataract surgery, better for patients’ care and convenience, AOA survey says
- Affiliates’ advocacy teams prepare to convene for meeting of the minds
- Doctors of optometry in Texas and Nevada build bulwark against vision plan abuses
- DeSantis decision delivers historic win for Florida optometrists and patients
- AOA and state affiliates rally to decry and defeat discriminatory ‘not-a-doctor’ bills
- Optometry’s scope wins draw new attacks from medical and ophthalmology groups
- Regional Advocacy Meetings prime states’ advocates for 2023 battles and beyond
- Hubble Contacts fined for deceptive trade practices in Texas
- Scope victory for Colorado
- Regional Advocacy Meetings strengthen states advocacy
- Virginia scope advancement
- 1-800 Contacts’ attempt to undermine law thwarted by Georgia doctors yet again
- MOA rebuff insurers reprisals against Mississippi eye care providers
- New York gains oral medication prescribing authority
- California amends optometry’s approved treatments, medications and testing
- Kansas Insurance Department puts vision plans on notice
- State advocates fighting to defend and advance our profession
- The scope of success
- State Advocacy Summit amplifies lessons from year of historic scope victories
- Texas scope expansion gains doctors oral meds, glaucoma authority
- Wyoming expands scope to include contemporary laser-excision procedures
- Mississippi scope progresses, other states seeing early successes
- 7 states authorize doctors of optometry for COVID-19 vaccinations
- Going further-expanding advocacy efforts and educational and professional development efforts
- Pennsylvania and Iowa earn big victories to expand scope of practice
- Optometry patients win in Arkansas as ballot challenge to expanded practice law is invalidated
- VSP policy change may violate states patient protection laws
- Court-appointed official deems signatures at heart of Arkansas scope saga invalid
- Arkansas scope saga necessitates urgent action
- Scope expansion to save Americans billions annually
- State Government Relations Center presenting at Republican Attorneys General Association
- Arkansas secures expanded scope of practice
- Maryland expands scope of practice
- AOA state affiliates blaze path for optometry’s future
- Optometry can contribute high-quality health care at affordable prices
- AOA president Driving change
- NJ Vision Plan Bill 2018
- Massachusetts seeks glaucoma care expansion
- Alaska-Georgia legislative victories
- South Carolina legislators override veto safeguard patients vision health
- Georgia Nebraska advance patient centered legislation
- Indiana navigates telehealth bill exempts ophthalmic devices
- FTC DOJ weigh in on Massachusetts glaucoma care expansion
- Arizona No on contact lens prescription extension
- Kentucky heralds third party triumph in new law
- State association challenges mobile refractive service
- Texas doctor successfully challenges Aetna’s policy on panels
- Proposed state legislation doesnt address patient safety
- AOA steps up fight against 1 800 Contacts anti patient legislation
- Louisiana Governor Jindal signs expanded scope of practice bill
Massachusetts scope win adds glaucoma authority
January 7, 2021
A scope expansion years in the making was signed into law with a comprehensive health care and telehealth bill on New Year’s Day.
Tag(s): Advocacy, State Advocacy
Massachusetts doctors of optometry will be able to provide glaucoma treatments after a multifaceted, telehealth reform bill received New Year’s Day approval, capping years-long advocacy to modernize the state’s scope of practice.
Signed Jan. 1 by Gov. Charlie Baker, the comprehensive legislation ostensibly aimed at requiring insurance companies to cover telehealth visits in the same way as in-person visits, also contained a laundry list of health reforms to promote affordable care and patient access for Bay State residents, including an expansion of the state’s optometric scope of practice act for glaucoma treatments. Historically, Massachusetts’ prescriptive scope law made it the only state in the nation to deny doctors’ of optometry authority for glaucoma treatments as organized medical groups routinely imposed barriers to patients receiving contemporary optometric care.
“This is a significant and important step forward for doctors of optometry and their patients in the state of Massachusetts, and a step that has been over 14 years in the making,” says Wayne Zahka, O.D., executive director of the Massachusetts Society of Optometrists (MSO). “We share our gratitude to all the people who worked on our scope legislation over the years—these wins cannot be achieved alone. Every doctor of optometry should support the AOA and their state affiliates as these are the only organizations helping to accomplish this kind of work, helping position doctors to deliver the care our patients deserve.”
Specifically, the legislation permits doctors’ use and prescription of topical and oral therapeutical agents, including those in schedules III, IV, V and VI, for diagnosing, preventing, treating or managing glaucoma, as well as the prescription of all necessary eye medications, including oral anti-infectives. The legislation becomes law 90 days after the governor’s signature, and in the meantime, the state board will promulgate rules and the MSO will provide doctors additional information on certification going forward.
The legislation, reportedly accelerated by the COVID-19 public health emergency, is an amalgamation of administration health care reforms and priorities first identified in 2019. That original framework included direction to improve and align optometry’s scope of practice standards with other states, allowing optometry to treat glaucoma and other conditions and prescribe certain medications. But well prior to 2019, optometry’s advocates in Massachusetts worked diligently not only to keep scope expansion on the docket but also to change public perception.
“There has been great work over the years by many MSO members to develop strong support for optometry,” says Matthew Forgues, O.D., MSO immediate past president. “Our scope bill ultimately passed in a much larger health reform bill, but it was the groundwork and plan implemented by Dr. Zahka and our legislative committee over the past four years that made it happen.”
Building on years of advocacy work
In 2016, Massachusetts’ legislators were once again considering a bill in the statehouse to permit glaucoma treatment, but optometry’s advocates met a familiar barrier erected by organized medical groups—namely, the false perception that such expansion would harm patients. Notwithstanding, the MSO repeatedly emphasized that accredited schools and colleges of optometry—including both programs in Massachusetts—had taught glaucoma care and detection for years, and doctors of optometry had successfully diagnosed and provided such care for decades.
Concurrently, federal antitrust authorities stressed these same arguments in a formal response to legislators considering the scope modernization efforts. Then, the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice issued a joint statement that doctors of optometry “serve as a first line of defense” to “facilitate earlier diagnosis and less costly treatment of glaucoma,” and excluding doctors of optometry from offering such care “may limit price competition to serve these patients.”
The response continued: “Under current law, however, Massachusetts prohibits optometrists from treating glaucoma. Unwarranted restrictions may be reducing patient access, raising costs and foreclosing opportunities for early treatment. For these reasons, we encourage the legislature to consider whether patient welfare can be appropriately served by loosening this restriction.”
Although ultimately the 2016 bill would fail, the MSO committed to a different approach in the next legislative session that relied on changing the perception of optometric care. With Dr. Zahka as legislative chair, the MSO invested in a public awareness campaign, a renewed grassroots initiative and commissioned a study to evaluate the cost savings of expanded optometric scope. Dr. Zahka says the study results spoke for themselves: 86% of surveyed people in Massachusetts supported doctors of optometry providing glaucoma care, while such a scope expansion would save the state’s health system $20 million/year in duplicative fees alone, and over $53 million/year overall.
“Bringing those numbers to legislators along with a more patient-focused bill helped strengthen the argument why optometry should be part of the most recent overall health reform bill in Massachusetts,” Dr. Forgues notes. “We changed the focus of the bill to make it more patient centric and demonstrate how the lack of scope not only limits choice for patients but also increases their cost.”
Also bolstering that data and education was convincing testimony from an optometry student before the House’s Healthcare Finance Committee. Lauren Thamel, a New England College of Optometry (NECO) student, noted that while she was proud to become a third-generation Massachusetts doctor of optometry, many of her peers at the Massachusetts-based school had no intention of practicing within the state given its limited scope. Thamel backed those sentiments up with an informal poll of 101 NECO students that supported her claims, and as if punctuation to her testimony, the committee took no further questions.
“I drew attention to how not being able to take care of patients to the fullest extent in Massachusetts has led to many students graduating and moving away from our great state and taking those bright futures with them,” she says. “Although I think students played a role in helping us cross the finish line, this scope expansion would not have been possible without the tireless work from the MSO for many years. As a soon-to-be doctor in Massachusetts, I want to thank all the doctors before me for never giving up.”
Adds Dr. Zahka: “When we presented that as part of our education—reiterating that we need more doctors in remote areas and these graduates aren’t sticking around when they graduate—that really seems to have struck a chord.”
Although attempts to pass a standalone scope bill continued to meet resistance, Dr. Zahka notes the opportunity to include scope language within the most recent telehealth reform bill proved fruitful.
To learn more about state advocacy, the AOA has prepared resources to assist members and state affiliates in preparing to address scope expansion. Members may access the AOA’s toolkit for information and resources to better navigate the current political and legislative landscape, as well as how to engage with lawmakers, the media and key audiences.