- South Carolina Supreme Court upholds state’s Eye Care Patient Protection Law
- Arkansas doctors rallying to defeat EyeMed tactics that undermine purpose of state’s new VBM accountability law
- State champs
- Minnesota passes long-awaited scope expansion bill
- Texas unanimously passes groundbreaking VBM access bill
- 650+ reasons why these powerhouse state sessions are advancing optometry
- Study: ‘Unprecedented’ optometry scope of practice expansion benefits patients
- Major victory for West Virginia patients, optometrists
- North Dakota secures telemedicine provisions, ignites grassroots advocacy
- How to build productive relationships with legislators
- Why you should fight for scope expansion
- Committee spotlight: AOA’s State Government Relations Committee
- How Arkansas’ major VBM law delivers on calls to promote fairness, doctor-patient relationships
- Texas optometrists mount defense in court and legislature of landmark law on vision plan abuses
- The case for expanding scope of optometry
- In rural America, opportunity for optometry amid shortfall of ophthalmologists
- Destination: Scope expansion
- Double duty: Doctors of optometry bring their vision to state legislatures
- 'High value' strategy sessions prep states’ advocacy
- VBM abuses scrutinized by state policy think tank, U.S. Senate opens new investigation
- AOA, affiliates’ foundational advocacy work advancing optometry
- South Carolina judge overrules Visibly challenge to consumer protection law
- Oklahoma secures optometry’s latest win over vision plan abuses
- What kind of impact is optometry making on the nation’s eye health?
- ‘Profits over patients cannot continue’ with VBMs; Texas testifies at health insurance hearing
- Kentucky attorney general holds Warby Parker accountable for its online vision test
- New York assembly bill potentially sows division in health care
- California warily watches ‘not-a-doctor’ wording in Senate bill
- Latest: Texas defends landmark vision plan law
- West Virginia adds optometric surgical procedures
- Florida optometrists quash effort—again—to pass ‘not-a-doctor’ bill
- South Dakota secures scope expansion for injections, optometric laser procedures
- Affiliates, AOA preparing for fresh attacks on optometry: 'Not-a-doctor' bills are back
- Texas vision plan law, now in effect, sees favorable development in federal lawsuit
- Proposal in Utah would restrict contact lens patient choice, disrupt doctor-patient relationship
- Affiliates, AOA share forward-thinking strategies for optometry’s advocates
- Texas’ vision plan law takes effect, court challenge continues
- Doctors of optometry in New Hampshire earn authorization to provide vaccines to public
- New Texas law halts vision plans’ anti-competitive, monopolistic behaviors
- YAG procedures by doctors of optometry, after cataract surgery, better for patients’ care and convenience, AOA survey says
- Affiliates’ advocacy teams prepare to convene for meeting of the minds
- Doctors of optometry in Texas and Nevada build bulwark against vision plan abuses
- DeSantis decision delivers historic win for Florida optometrists and patients
- AOA and state affiliates rally to decry and defeat discriminatory ‘not-a-doctor’ bills
- Optometry’s scope wins draw new attacks from medical and ophthalmology groups
- Regional Advocacy Meetings prime states’ advocates for 2023 battles and beyond
- Hubble Contacts fined for deceptive trade practices in Texas
- Scope victory for Colorado
- Regional Advocacy Meetings strengthen states advocacy
- Virginia scope advancement
- 1-800 Contacts’ attempt to undermine law thwarted by Georgia doctors yet again
- MOA rebuff insurers reprisals against Mississippi eye care providers
- New York gains oral medication prescribing authority
- California amends optometry’s approved treatments, medications and testing
- Kansas Insurance Department puts vision plans on notice
- State advocates fighting to defend and advance our profession
- The scope of success
- State Advocacy Summit amplifies lessons from year of historic scope victories
- Texas scope expansion gains doctors oral meds, glaucoma authority
- Wyoming expands scope to include contemporary laser-excision procedures
- Mississippi scope progresses, other states seeing early successes
- 7 states authorize doctors of optometry for COVID-19 vaccinations
- Massachusetts scope win adds glaucoma authority
- Going further-expanding advocacy efforts and educational and professional development efforts
- Pennsylvania and Iowa earn big victories to expand scope of practice
- Optometry patients win in Arkansas as ballot challenge to expanded practice law is invalidated
- VSP policy change may violate states patient protection laws
- Court-appointed official deems signatures at heart of Arkansas scope saga invalid
- Arkansas scope saga necessitates urgent action
- Scope expansion to save Americans billions annually
- State Government Relations Center presenting at Republican Attorneys General Association
- Arkansas secures expanded scope of practice
- Maryland expands scope of practice
- AOA state affiliates blaze path for optometry’s future
- Optometry can contribute high-quality health care at affordable prices
- AOA president Driving change
- NJ Vision Plan Bill 2018
- Massachusetts seeks glaucoma care expansion
- Alaska-Georgia legislative victories
- South Carolina legislators override veto safeguard patients vision health
- Georgia Nebraska advance patient centered legislation
- Indiana navigates telehealth bill exempts ophthalmic devices
- FTC DOJ weigh in on Massachusetts glaucoma care expansion
- Arizona No on contact lens prescription extension
- Kentucky heralds third party triumph in new law
- State association challenges mobile refractive service
- Texas doctor successfully challenges Aetna’s policy on panels
- Proposed state legislation doesnt address patient safety
- AOA steps up fight against 1 800 Contacts anti patient legislation
- Louisiana Governor Jindal signs expanded scope of practice bill
Vision test kiosks elicit state patient safety alert
January 13, 2026
Pennsylvania doctors of optometry sound the alarm on Eyebot kiosk pilot
Tag(s): Advocacy, State Advocacy
Key Takeaways
- The Pennsylvania Optometric Association (POA) issued a formal patient safety alert regarding Eyebot kiosks currently piloted at 16 major retail locations in the state, asserting these 15-minute automated tests are no substitute for comprehensive eye care.
- Autonomous vision tests may create a false sense of reassurance and risk delaying timely diagnoses of ocular or systemic health conditions that can only be detected during an in-person, comprehensive eye examination.
- The POA emphasized that the public often confuses a vision test with a medical eye exam, a distinction some claim could be what the tech company is counting on to prioritize eyeglasses sales over patient health.
- The AOA is actively championing patient protection by urging the FTC and FDA to investigate Eyebot for potential Eyeglass Rule violations, while at the same time updating policies to clarify that direct-to-patient technology should never replace doctor-led diagnostic care.
Vision test kiosks emerging at major retailers across Pennsylvania prompted a statewide safety alert warning consumers against sub-standard eye health and vision care.
On Monday, the Pennsylvania Optometric Association (POA) issued its patient safety alert concerning Eyebot, a largely unregulated, automated vision-testing kiosk installed at 16 Walmart and Sam’s Club locations across the state. Though the retailer considers such kiosks a “pilot program” for expanding access, the POA and AOA both warn an autonomous, 15-minute vision test is no substitute for comprehensive eye health and vision care provided by an eye care provider. Further, Eyebot runs the risk of disincentivizing consumers from seeking regular, comprehensive eye examinations.
“The POA strongly supports innovation that improves access to eye care and embraces new technology when it enhances patient outcomes,” says POA President Erin Draper, O.D. “However, we oppose the introduction of kiosk refractions because they do not provide a comprehensive eye exam and may give end-users a false sense of reassurance regarding their ocular health.”
Deferring routine care increases the risk of delayed diagnosis for conditions that might lead to vision loss or other serious health complications. Dr. Draper adds: “Rather than improving access to eye care, this type of care model is likely to further widen healthcare disparities.”
The POA patient safety alert notes that Eyebot placements elsewhere have already resulted in detailed complaints with state regulatory officials, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), gathered and reported not only by the AOA but also other health advocacy groups.
Every Pennsylvanian deserves the recognized standard of care, an in-person eye examination with their eye care provider—and there is no substitute for that care. Dr. Draper strongly condemns that “any corporation advising otherwise can and should be publicly fact-checked and, when necessary, investigated by the authorities.”
With health misinformation on the rise and patients facing potential new risks, the patient safety alert says, the POA and its doctors are prepared to answer questions about essential eye health and vision care services, patient access and the limits of products and services that are intended to stand apart from or work to undermine doctor-led and coordinated health care delivery. The alert urges patients to consult with their local POA doctor of optometry to get accurate information regarding Eyebot.
The company’s announcement of its Pennsylvania pilot program elicited a direct response from many within the optometric community, including Cory Lappin, O.D.’s, column Optometric Physician. Dr. Lappin warns the pilot program, if deemed successful, might be expanded into as many markets as possible—to the detriment of consumers.
“If everyone is being honest,” Dr. Lappin writes, “the general public does not know the difference between a vision test and an eye exam ... In many patients’ minds, the prescription is the exam. The company behind Eyebot not only knows this; they are counting on it. Despite their lip service, they are aware that most who use the kiosk will never get an in-person exam.”
Dr. Lappin continues: “There will be some challenges to this of course, as the AOA has already raised safety concerns over the technology and certain states have safeguards in place to define what constitutes an eye exam, but you can clearly see the push and money behind this trend.”
AOA has raised concerns about Eyebot
The POA’s advocacy comes as the AOA continues to raise concerns about Eyebot kiosks, a technology that began emerging in New England in 2024. The kiosks promise 90-second “vision tests” and doctor-reviewed eyeglass prescriptions through a partnership with Zenni Optical. These are free with the purchase of a pair of glasses priced at $49 or more.
In a joint letter to the FTC and FDA, then-AOA President Steven T. Reed, O.D., and David Metsch, O.D., president of the Massachusetts Society of Optometrists, encouraged further assessment to safeguard patient health and privacy, as well as the relationship between Eyebot and Zenni Optical.
“We believe that the technology needs to be assessed to ensure compliance with federal rules and immediate attention is warranted to address misinformation regarding the capabilities and accuracy of this product,” the letter states.
In addition, AOA raised concerns with a potential violation of PART 456—OPHTHALMIC PRACTICE RULES (EYEGLASS RULE) section 456.2, separation of examination and dispensing. The regulations indicate it is an unfair act or practice for an ophthalmologist or optometrist to fail to provide to the patient one copy of the patient’s prescription immediately after the refractive eye examination is completed and before offering to sell the patient ophthalmic goods, whether or not the prescription is requested by the patient.
Eyebot and Zenni’s offering to patients inherently ties the purchase of prescription eyewear to the release of the prescription, and those who choose not to purchase from Zenni are forced to pay for the prescription and vision test if they choose not to purchase from Zenni.
In 2025, the AOA revised its Policy Statement on Telemedicine in Optometry to specifically refer to technology such as Eyebot. Direct-to-patient technology should not be used as a replacement for a comprehensive eye exam or for diagnostic eye, health or vision conditions.
The AOA is monitoring the Eyebot development and will continue to advocate for the highest sta