The AMD, aspirin balancing act

July 29, 2019
More evidence suggests the benefits of aspirin use in mitigating cardiovascular risks outweighs any possible risk of exacerbating AMD, per a new study analyzing AREDS patients.
The AMD, aspirin balancing act

A low-dose aspirin regimen is medically necessary for many Americans' cardiovascular disease risk, including those with age-related macular degeneration (AMD)—and that's okay, researchers say.

Published online in Ophthalmology, an analysis of patients in the landmark Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) and AREDS2 found no significant association between aspirin use and progression to late AMD or subtypes. Such evidence adds to the prevailing wisdom regarding AMD patients prescribed the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, e.g., that the overall benefits of aspirin use on decreasing risk of cardiovascular incidents far outweigh any risks to AMD progression.The leading cause of severe vision loss among U.S. adults over age 50, AMD currently affects 1.8 million people

with another 7.3 million at substantial risk for AMD-related vision loss. Essentially the loss of central vision from changes in the macula, AMD occurs in two forms: the more common, atrophic (dry) AMD that cannot be treated or cured, and the less common, exudative or neovascular (wet) AMD that may respond to laser procedures or injections.

In the case of the latter, regular aspirin use has been linked to exacerbating the risk of wet AMD, independent of history of cardiovascular disease or smoking. However, the risk is a comparatively small one—a 1% risk of developing wet AMD after 10 years for aspirin users versus 0.5% for nonusers as reported in the Beaver Dam Eye Study—and in the case of this most recent analysis, may be negligible.

Per the recent analysis, researchers looked at 1,950 "matched" AREDS participants (28% took aspirin regularly) and 1,694 matched AREDS2 participants (nearly 50% took aspirin regularly) over a 10-year and 5-year, respective, follow-up period.

Among the AREDS group, 23% progressed to late AMD, nearly 18% developed geographic atrophy and 14% progressed to neovascular AMD after 10 years. Alternatively, among the AREDS2 group, 38% developed late AMD, nearly 25% developed geographic atrophy and 20% progressed to neovascular AMD. Despite those percentages, researchers did not find a significant association with progression to late AMD or subtypes.

"Aspirin use was not associated significantly with progression to late AMD or its subtypes in either the AREDS or AREDS2," authors concluded. "Patients with AMD need not avoid aspirin for this reason when its use is medically indicated."

Aspirin's dark side

Medically indicated is the optimal phrase. Millions of Americans take a daily, low-dose aspirin based on years of research that show its ability to mitigate heart disease and stroke, decreasing risk of cardiovascular disease by as much as 10% over a decade. But aspirin has its downside. Notwithstanding this cardiovascular prowess, regular aspirin use has serious side effects that don't outweigh overall benefits in otherwise healthy adults.

Recently, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) announced daily, low-dose aspirin is no longer recommended for older adults who don't have a high risk or existing heart disease. The change came after three clinical trials in 2018 found any benefit gained from aspirin would be more than offset by the risk of internal bleeding or ulcer development, among other side effects, in people considered to have low or moderate risk of heart disease, reports say.

What's more, the study that spurred the joint ACC/AHA announcement suggested as many as 6.6 million Americans were taking daily, low-dose aspirin without a doctor's recommendation. Overall, 30-40 million Americans age 40 and older are using aspirin to prevent cardiovascular disease, including nearly half of seniors without heart disease.

Those numbers bring up an interesting question regarding management of patients with AMD and elected versus medically necessary aspirin use, says Steven Ferrucci, O.D., chief of optometry at Sepulveda VA Ambulatory Care Center and Nursing Home and professor at Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University.

"I would not recommend patients with AMD discontinuing their aspirin if recommended by their physician for decreased stroke risk, valve replacement or other cardiovascular risk," Dr. Ferrucci notes. "However, it's clear that many patients may just start aspirin use on their own and perhaps do not really need to be on it."

Based on this newest evidence, Dr. Ferrucci suggests it's prudent for doctors of optometry to review aspirin use among patients with AMD. So, too, doctors might inquire with patients' primary care providers as to whether it's advisable to continue what could amount to an unnecessary regimen, given the small increased risk of AMD advancement.

Read more about another popular medication and its interplay with glaucoma.

Related News

Research on eye aberrations not abstract to award-winning scientists

For the sixth consecutive year, the AOA is sponsoring the Investigator Initiated Research Award. Investigators are invited to electronically submit proposals by June 15 for projects designed to increase knowledge through basic clinical and/or translational science related to the continuum of eye and vision care. Jason Marsack, Ph.D., talks about the work he and his collaborators are currently pursuing in the laboratory.

AOA, CooperVision mobilize to ‘disrupt the status quo,’ advance new standard of care for children with myopia

The Myopia Collective’s goal is to elevate the standard of care for children with myopia, shifting the focus beyond optical correction to embracing comprehensive treatment. The collective’s “Change Agents” will lead the charge. Doctors of optometry across the country provide more than two-thirds of primary eye health and vision care.

What do the experts say on genetic testing for IRDs?

Genetic testing and counseling are critical for patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). A new AOA resource offers insights into the role doctors of optometry play in considering genetic testing for IRDs, including providing in-office testing or referring to offices that do.