- 2025 code changes: What doctors of optometry need to know
- Introducing the new CMS G2211 code
- Coordination of benefits 3 takeaways for optometric billing practices
- Clearing up modifier confusion
- Payor Downcoding: What Is It and What Should You Do About It
- New noteworthy optometry codes
- Modifier -25: How to use it appropriately and avoid costly penalties
- 3 coding questions cracked
- CPT codes deleted in 2023—do you know what codes may be billed to replace them?
- Why Proper Documentation Is Vital
- Common coding questions answered
- How and when to code for social determinants of health
- Most asked coding questions: dilation
- What does COVID-19 PHE ending mean for telemedicine
- 2 points to keep in mind when patients decline dilation
- social determinants of health
- Can a doctor of optometry bill Medicare for a comprehensive eye exam and a procedure on the same day
- The future of audio-only reimbursement
- Coding conundrums solved
- 7 takeaways from the 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule
- Virtual check-in codes
- What your colleagues are asking about coding
- CMS releases 2023 Medicare PFS proposed rule
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System: What doctors should know
- Ask the coding experts
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System quality measures
- Coding for presbyopia eye drops
- Coding and contact lens safety
- CMS 2022 Medicare PFS decreases conversion factor sets new policy goals
- CMS releases information on Part B claims-based quality measure scoring for 2021
- Updated ICD-10 codes take effect October 1
- If it sounds too good to be true
- New EM codes
- What to do when a coding decision is made incorrectly
- 4 coding changes now in effect
- changes in 2021 to coding and documentation for evaluation and management services.
- AOA HPI provides coding benchmark data
- Appropriate use of modifier 25
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management services
- AOA Coding Experts gain AMA CPT appointments
- 2020 updates to the ICD-10 code set
- Medicares virtual check-in codes
- The importance of accurate coding and contact lens safety
- coding for cognitive development test
- Medicare evaluation and management documentation and billing
- Coding and audits
- 5 coding queries cracked
- appropriate diagnosis code reporting
- Diagnostic code changes
- 4 coding conundrums clarified
- Where coding and coverage intersect
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management documentation and reimbursement
- Global period data collection and possible future changes
- New ICD-10 codes effective
- July-Aug17_Coding Q&As
- The ICD 10 code development process
- coding experts-billing for post-cataract glasses
- accurate coding for public health
- July Aug 2017 Coding Experts
- September Coding Experts
- CMS data collection on postoperative visits
- 3 solutions to common coding problems
- 3 coding changes doctors need to know
- Coding cases cracked
- New diabetes related diagnosis codes
- Get answers to your coding questions
- New ICD10 codes doctors need to know
- Be aware of changes for 2017 and beyond
- Common coding Qs answered
- Coverage indications limitations and medical necessity
- 4 tips for competing with online retailers
- Coding questions cracked
- Access online coding resource for AOA members
- What is the future of CPT coding
- CMS makes changes in how doctors revalidate Medicare enrollment information
- 5 coding changes and clarifications doctors need to know
- More ICD 10 coding Q&As
- Doctors of optometry could see a rise in labor costs under new federal overtime rule
- 4 tips for growing your practice
- HHS unveils proposed rule for new Quality Payment Program
- Ask the Coding Experts Comparative billing reports raise questions on glaucoma patient treatment and coding
- Ask the Coding Experts Modifier 24 and 25 usage
- ICD-10 coding QandAs October
- Ask the Coding Experts Chronic care management services
- ICD 10 transition So far so good
- CMS comparative billing reports What you need to know
- Ready resources for the ICD 10 rollout
- Coding Q&As
- Online payment option makes cents
- Modifiers for distinct procedural services
- Get a refresher on your public Open Payments data
- Final countdown Get answers to your ICD-10 coding questions
- AOA clarifies meaningful use rule on electronic order entry
- More ICD 10 coding QandAs
- Vision therapy coding
- Medicare claims and requests for additional documentation
- Coding QnAs May
- Referring ordering and form 8550
- Reporting code 92250
- One-year Medicare payment fix extends ICD-10 deadline
What Medicare’s 2020 PFS changes mean for optometry
November 13, 2019
Medicare finalized its 2020 PFS with changes to E/M codes, MIPS requirements and more. How AOA’s input shaped rulemaking and what it means for doctors.
Medicare's 2020 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) reflects AOA advocacy on key program changes slated to affect optometry, including revisions to Evaluation and Management (E/M) codes and Quality Payment Program reporting requirements.
Released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on Nov. 1, the final rule updates payment policies, rates and quality provisions for services furnished under the PFS come Jan. 1, 2020, and reportedly reflects administration efforts to improve accessibility, quality, affordability, empowerment and innovation. Specifically, the final rule updates E/M code changes and relative value of services that will take effect in 2021; updates quality reporting requirements for 2020, including those under the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS); clarifies Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) recommendations for 2021; and approves program alterations related to prescription or opioid drug initiatives in 2021.
In July, CMS proposed policy changes that would impact how doctors of optometry and other physicians furnish care and get reimbursed for CY2020. The AOA responded in public comments with recommendations to individual proposals, many of which now are reflected in the final rule.
Barbara L. Horn, O.D., AOA president, says the final rule demonstrates how effectively AOA advocates on behalf of the profession and ensures optometry isn't overlooked in decisions affecting Medicare.
"Each year, CMS updates these payment rules and policies with an aim toward improving the quality and efficiency of care," Dr. Horn says. "Our AOA is vital for keeping tabs on how these policies may directly or indirectly affect optometry, and our aim is to proactively advocate for improvements to the Medicare program that benefit our doctors and patients."
MIPS changes, new framework
In addition to clarifying quality measures and reporting requirements under MIPS, CMS' final rule introduced a new framework for clinicians to participate in the future.
Called MIPS Value Pathways (MVP), this new model would move away from the current state of MIPS-requiring clinicians to report across performance categories, including Quality, Cost, Promoting Interoperability and Improvement Activities (IAs)—to a program that allows clinicians to select among clinically related, specialty-specific measurement sets to report on commensurate with their scope of practice.
While the AOA cautioned CMS to carefully consider timing and rollout of MVP, CMS agreed to work with stakeholders in a meaningful way to ensure this initiative can further reduce reporting burden and ease the transition to Advanced Payment Models.
Additionally, CMS finalized criteria surrounding "topped out" measures and removal of measures under MIPS. The AOA argued that rather than eliminating "extremely" topped out measures, CMS should raise the data completeness threshold for those retained measures to allow physicians with limited reporting options the ability to continue program participation. So, too, the AOA recommended that measures should only be removed when a measure steward restricts access to the measure by QCDRs, and CMS agreed, determining a measure may be removed if determined it is not available for MIPS quality reporting by or on behalf of all MIPS eligible clinicians.
Lastly, the AOA raised concerns with CMS' proposal to increase group reporting thresholds to at least 50% of a group's clinicians to receive credit for an IA, adding that it's a significant policy change and increase over the previous requirement of only one clinician from a group. The CMS finalized a modified version, such that at least 50% of a group's clinicians must perform the same IA for any continuous 90 days in the performance period beginning with the 2020 performance year. This should allow clinicians flexibility to choose the most appropriate 90-day period while still increasing participation.
E/M office visits
Continuing CMS' goal to reduce physician burden and improve the accuracy of payments for E/M visits , the final rule confirms changes to documentation policies, as well as coding and payment changes to take effect Jan. 1, 2021. These E/M coding changes align with the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) framework and Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) recommendations for E/M office visits.
The CPT coding changes retain 5 levels of coding for established patients and reduce the number of levels to 4 for office/outpatient E/M visits for new patients, and revise code definitions. Additionally, the CPT code changes also revise the times and medical decision-making process for all of the codes and allow clinicians to choose the E/M visit level based on either medical decision-making or time.
The E/M revision process is several years in the making and the AOA has been engaged from the start, stressing that any E/M add-on codes should not be specialty-specific but open to all physician types. The final rule retains that approach and doctors of optometry can now report the add-on code for primary care and patients with serious conditions.
The AOA notes that while CMS estimates a small reduction for optometry, this could prove inaccurate if doctors' usage of E/M codes changes in the coming year and higher-level E/M codes are reported. Additionally, CMS did not consider that doctors of optometry would report the add-on code for primary care or patients with serious or complex conditions.
Pertaining to the valuation of codes, CMS finalized the AOA's recommendation to adopt RUC-recommended work and practice expense values for Corneal Hysteresis Determination (CPT code 92145) and Ophthalmoscopy (CPT codes 92201 and 92202).
Higher Medicare Part B deductibles
Increased spending on physician-administered drugs also predicated CMS' increase on enrollees' Medicare Part B premiums and deductibles in 2020. Both monthly premiums and deductibles will rise nearly 7%, meaning doctors of optometry will likewise need to adjust their deductible to $198 from $185.
Lastly, CMS estimates that doctors of optometry will have total allowed charges of $1.33 billion in 2020, as compared to a 2019 estimate of $1.30 billion.