- New Demodex blepharitis codes available for optometrists
- Ask the Coding Experts
- The key to deflecting downcoding? Diagnosis code reporting
- 2025 code changes: What doctors of optometry need to know
- Introducing the new CMS G2211 code
- Coordination of benefits 3 takeaways for optometric billing practices
- Clearing up modifier confusion
- Payor Downcoding: What Is It and What Should You Do About It
- New noteworthy optometry codes
- Modifier -25: How to use it appropriately and avoid costly penalties
- 3 coding questions cracked
- CPT codes deleted in 2023—do you know what codes may be billed to replace them?
- Why Proper Documentation Is Vital
- Common coding questions answered
- How and when to code for social determinants of health
- Most asked coding questions: dilation
- What does COVID-19 PHE ending mean for telemedicine
- 2 points to keep in mind when patients decline dilation
- social determinants of health
- Can a doctor of optometry bill Medicare for a comprehensive eye exam and a procedure on the same day
- The future of audio-only reimbursement
- Coding conundrums solved
- 7 takeaways from the 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule
- Virtual check-in codes
- What your colleagues are asking about coding
- CMS releases 2023 Medicare PFS proposed rule
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System: What doctors should know
- Ask the coding experts
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System quality measures
- Coding for presbyopia eye drops
- Coding and contact lens safety
- CMS 2022 Medicare PFS decreases conversion factor sets new policy goals
- CMS releases information on Part B claims-based quality measure scoring for 2021
- Updated ICD-10 codes take effect October 1
- If it sounds too good to be true
- New EM codes
- What to do when a coding decision is made incorrectly
- 4 coding changes now in effect
- changes in 2021 to coding and documentation for evaluation and management services.
- AOA HPI provides coding benchmark data
- Appropriate use of modifier 25
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management services
- AOA Coding Experts gain AMA CPT appointments
- 2020 PFS changes for optometry
- 2020 updates to the ICD-10 code set
- Medicares virtual check-in codes
- The importance of accurate coding and contact lens safety
- coding for cognitive development test
- Medicare evaluation and management documentation and billing
- Coding and audits
- 5 coding queries cracked
- appropriate diagnosis code reporting
- Diagnostic code changes
- 4 coding conundrums clarified
- Where coding and coverage intersect
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management documentation and reimbursement
- Global period data collection and possible future changes
- New ICD-10 codes effective
- July-Aug17_Coding Q&As
- The ICD 10 code development process
- coding experts-billing for post-cataract glasses
- July Aug 2017 Coding Experts
- September Coding Experts
- CMS data collection on postoperative visits
- 3 solutions to common coding problems
- 3 coding changes doctors need to know
- Coding cases cracked
- New diabetes related diagnosis codes
- Get answers to your coding questions
- New ICD10 codes doctors need to know
- Be aware of changes for 2017 and beyond
- Common coding Qs answered
- Coverage indications limitations and medical necessity
- 4 tips for competing with online retailers
- Coding questions cracked
- Access online coding resource for AOA members
- What is the future of CPT coding
- CMS makes changes in how doctors revalidate Medicare enrollment information
- 5 coding changes and clarifications doctors need to know
- More ICD 10 coding Q&As
- Doctors of optometry could see a rise in labor costs under new federal overtime rule
- 4 tips for growing your practice
- HHS unveils proposed rule for new Quality Payment Program
- Ask the Coding Experts Comparative billing reports raise questions on glaucoma patient treatment and coding
- Ask the Coding Experts Modifier 24 and 25 usage
- ICD-10 coding QandAs October
- Ask the Coding Experts Chronic care management services
- ICD 10 transition So far so good
- CMS comparative billing reports What you need to know
- Ready resources for the ICD 10 rollout
- Coding Q&As
- Online payment option makes cents
- Modifiers for distinct procedural services
- Get a refresher on your public Open Payments data
- Final countdown Get answers to your ICD-10 coding questions
- AOA clarifies meaningful use rule on electronic order entry
- More ICD 10 coding QandAs
- Vision therapy coding
- Medicare claims and requests for additional documentation
- Coding QnAs May
- Referring ordering and form 8550
- Reporting code 92250
- One-year Medicare payment fix extends ICD-10 deadline
The importance of accurate coding for public health
May 30, 2017
It’s critical that agencies such as the CDC have accurate data regarding contact lens complications.
Ask the Coding Experts, by Doug Morrow, O.D., Harvey Richman, O.D., Rebecca Wartman, O.D. Excerpted from page 48 of the April 2017 edition of AOA Focus.
In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published the report "Estimated Burden of Keratitis—United States, 2010." The report concluded that annually there are nearly 1 million emergency room and urgent doctor visits, and about $175 million is added to health care costs arising from keratitis linked to improper contact lens use.
In the CDC report, it was noted that "the estimated prevalence of visits for keratitis-related diagnostic codes is likely to be an underestimate, because the datasets used in this analysis capture few visits to optometrists." The CDC report also noted that "increased surveillance capacity is needed for microbial keratitis, in particular data from optometrist visits."
Through AOA MORE (Measures and Outcomes Registry for Eyecare), the AOA is working to better capture data on the optometric profession for use in advocacy and research efforts. Having more data to show what we know about the outcomes that doctors of optometry achieve will be a valuable tool for the profession. This type of data collection also can assist in public health awareness and education.
While contact lenses are a safe and effective vision correction tool for millions of Americans, appropriate physician oversight is critical. In a time when some would like to downplay the status of contact lenses as Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-regulated medical devices that require physician oversight, it is critical that agencies such as the CDC have accurate data regarding complications that may occur related to contact lenses.
In order for the data collected by the AOA and other groups to be useful, accurate coding is a must. With regard to contact lens-related complications, it is essential that doctors are appropriately coding patient incidents that are related to contact lens problems. Below is an overview of the diagnosis codes that can be used to accurately report when an eye injury is related to contact lens use:
- H18.211 Corneal edema secondary to contact lens, right eye
- H18.212 Corneal edema secondary to contact lens, left eye
- H18.213 Corneal edema secondary to contact lens, bilateral
- H18.821 Corneal disorder due to contact lens, right eye
- H18.822 Corneal disorder due to contact lens, left eye
- H18.823 Corneal disorder due to contact lens, bilateral
Keratitis should be reported with the H16 code series.