- 2025 code changes: What doctors of optometry need to know
- Introducing the new CMS G2211 code
- Coordination of benefits 3 takeaways for optometric billing practices
- Clearing up modifier confusion
- Payor Downcoding: What Is It and What Should You Do About It
- New noteworthy optometry codes
- Modifier -25: How to use it appropriately and avoid costly penalties
- 3 coding questions cracked
- CPT codes deleted in 2023—do you know what codes may be billed to replace them?
- Why Proper Documentation Is Vital
- Common coding questions answered
- How and when to code for social determinants of health
- Most asked coding questions: dilation
- What does COVID-19 PHE ending mean for telemedicine
- 2 points to keep in mind when patients decline dilation
- social determinants of health
- Can a doctor of optometry bill Medicare for a comprehensive eye exam and a procedure on the same day
- The future of audio-only reimbursement
- Coding conundrums solved
- 7 takeaways from the 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule
- Virtual check-in codes
- What your colleagues are asking about coding
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System: What doctors should know
- Ask the coding experts
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System quality measures
- Coding for presbyopia eye drops
- Coding and contact lens safety
- CMS 2022 Medicare PFS decreases conversion factor sets new policy goals
- CMS releases information on Part B claims-based quality measure scoring for 2021
- Updated ICD-10 codes take effect October 1
- If it sounds too good to be true
- New EM codes
- What to do when a coding decision is made incorrectly
- 4 coding changes now in effect
- changes in 2021 to coding and documentation for evaluation and management services.
- AOA HPI provides coding benchmark data
- Appropriate use of modifier 25
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management services
- AOA Coding Experts gain AMA CPT appointments
- 2020 PFS changes for optometry
- 2020 updates to the ICD-10 code set
- Medicares virtual check-in codes
- The importance of accurate coding and contact lens safety
- coding for cognitive development test
- Medicare evaluation and management documentation and billing
- Coding and audits
- 5 coding queries cracked
- appropriate diagnosis code reporting
- Diagnostic code changes
- 4 coding conundrums clarified
- Where coding and coverage intersect
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management documentation and reimbursement
- Global period data collection and possible future changes
- New ICD-10 codes effective
- July-Aug17_Coding Q&As
- The ICD 10 code development process
- coding experts-billing for post-cataract glasses
- accurate coding for public health
- July Aug 2017 Coding Experts
- September Coding Experts
- CMS data collection on postoperative visits
- 3 solutions to common coding problems
- 3 coding changes doctors need to know
- Coding cases cracked
- New diabetes related diagnosis codes
- Get answers to your coding questions
- New ICD10 codes doctors need to know
- Be aware of changes for 2017 and beyond
- Common coding Qs answered
- Coverage indications limitations and medical necessity
- 4 tips for competing with online retailers
- Coding questions cracked
- Access online coding resource for AOA members
- What is the future of CPT coding
- CMS makes changes in how doctors revalidate Medicare enrollment information
- 5 coding changes and clarifications doctors need to know
- More ICD 10 coding Q&As
- Doctors of optometry could see a rise in labor costs under new federal overtime rule
- 4 tips for growing your practice
- HHS unveils proposed rule for new Quality Payment Program
- Ask the Coding Experts Comparative billing reports raise questions on glaucoma patient treatment and coding
- Ask the Coding Experts Modifier 24 and 25 usage
- ICD-10 coding QandAs October
- Ask the Coding Experts Chronic care management services
- ICD 10 transition So far so good
- CMS comparative billing reports What you need to know
- Ready resources for the ICD 10 rollout
- Coding Q&As
- Online payment option makes cents
- Modifiers for distinct procedural services
- Get a refresher on your public Open Payments data
- Final countdown Get answers to your ICD-10 coding questions
- AOA clarifies meaningful use rule on electronic order entry
- More ICD 10 coding QandAs
- Vision therapy coding
- Medicare claims and requests for additional documentation
- Coding QnAs May
- Referring ordering and form 8550
- Reporting code 92250
- One-year Medicare payment fix extends ICD-10 deadline
CMS releases 2023 Medicare PFS proposed rule, seeks comments
July 13, 2022
The proposed PFS has implications on several ophthalmic procedures’ RUC values, MIPS and telehealth services, and decreases the conversion factor and reimbursement without Congressional action.
Medicare physicians face continued uncertainty over statutory reductions as the proposed 2023 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) outlines a flat payment update, while the AOA prepares comments on a range of policy changes affecting optometry next year.
On July 7, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published its 2023 PFS proposed rule to announce and solicit public comments on policy changes for Medicare payments taking effect on or after Jan. 1, 2023. While the proposed PFS reflects a broader administration-wide strategy for accessibility, quality, affordability and innovation in a more equitable health care system, the policy proposals do include specific changes that would impact optometry, if finalized.
Therefore, the AOA will submit public comments on behalf of the profession for the below policy changes, as well as continue to advocate for Congress to avert an impending fiscal cliff that could see nearly 15% cuts to Medicare physician payments in 2023.
Conversion factor decrease
The 2023 PFS proposes a $1.52 decrease in the conversion factor, resulting in a calendar year (CY) 2023 conversion factor of $33.08. This represents a decrease of $1.52 to the 2022 conversion factor of $34.61.
The CMS explains the decreased conversion factor because of budget neutrality adjustments that require a statutory update of 0% to the CY 2023 conversion factor, as well as the expiration of the offsetting 3% increase in PFS payments for CY 2022. The latter was a provision the AOA fought for and won inclusion in the Protecting Medicare and American Farmers from Sequester Cuts Act at the end of 2021 to temporarily extend increased physician reimbursement due to pandemic-related expenses.
In addition to the conversion factor decrease, further cuts could be coming to Medicare physicians’ pay in 2023 as automatic budget controls were tripped by Congress’ emergency COVID-19 spending. Already, reimbursements are reduced 2.75% due to the expiration of an AOA-backed fix that saw two 1% Medicare sequester cuts take effect in 2022.
Still outstanding are sizable reductions due to a ballooning scorecard mandated under the federal Pay-As-You-Go statute, now at least 8%, and the offsetting 3% PFS increase set to expire at year’s end that could affect doctors’ pay in 2023 without Congressional intervention. Congress needs to know that these impending cuts are unacceptable and any efforts to find a workable solution must fully value the care provided by doctors of optometry. Lawmakers also need to hear that simply stopping the cuts is not enough and that Congress must continue working with the AOA and other physician organizations to develop and enact lasting Medicare payment reform this year that ensures positive payment updates instead of annual threats of cuts.
Advocates’ immediate action is necessary, and here’s how you can get involved:
Contact your lawmakers via the AOA Action Center. Reach out directly with the aid of a pre-populated message expressing concern over the statutory reductions to Medicare physicians’ pay. Or text “PAYMENT” to 855.465.5124 to access the Action Center on your mobile device.
Audiology, dental service changes
Significantly, the CMS proposes two policy changes that would have the effect of expanding beneficiaries’ access to audiology services, as well as clarifying coverage for select dental care services.
As for the former, the CMS proposes allowing beneficiaries to have direct access, where appropriate, to an audiologist without a physician referral by creating a new HCPCS code for audiologists to use when billing for audiology services they already provide that are defined by other codes. The services encompassed by the new HCPCS code would allow beneficiaries to receive care or examinations for the purposes of hearing aids. Whereas in the latter case, the CMS proposes covering some additional dental care only when a clinical scenario presents where dental services may be inextricably linked to the clinical success of other covered medical services.
The AOA notes that both policy changes reflect conversations broached during Congress’ 2021 efforts to expand traditional Medicare benefits to include new hearing, dental and vision coverage. Throughout that year-long process, the AOA repeatedly made clear to lawmakers that any proposal for vision coverage expansion must meet the AOA’s specific core principles or risk being an unworkable benefit for patients and their doctors. Specifically, the AOA successfully beat back vision discount plan attempts to highjack and wrest control of the new refraction and materials benefit lawmakers had envisioned.
“It’s notable that the fee schedule did not include any proposals that would have devalued eye health care services and potentially restricted patient access to doctors of optometry,” says William T. Reynolds, O.D., AOA Advocacy Committee chair. “The AOA continues to stand firm against misguided proposals that impose anti-doctor and anti-patient mandates on optometry practices.”
RUC value changes for ophthalmic procedures
The CMS indicates it will accept both the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC)-recommended practice expense and work values for the orthoptics CPT code 92065, as well as the RUC-recommended practice expense and work values for the anterior segment imaging CPT code 99287.
Alternatively, the CMS rejects the RUC-recommended work value of 0.14 for the dark eye adaptation CPT code 92284. The CMS believes the work value was inaccurate as the procedure is usually completed during an evaluation and management (E/M) visit. Instead, the CMS proposed a physician work value of 0.00 for CPT code 92284, which is comparable to other “ophthalmic screening tests,” such as 99172. The AOA intends to fully address this issue as part of the public comment period on the 2023 PFS.
Cataract surgery in the office setting
The CMS reports it has received a request to establish non-facility values for the cataract surgery codes and vitrectomy codes, and it’s been suggested that these procedures can be properly performed in the non-facility office safely and effectively. Such is the case; the CMS seeks feedback on whether to pursue development of valuation of the cataract and vitrectomy codes in the non-facility setting.
MIPS registry engagement, specialty measure set
Within the 2023 PFS, the CMS proposes changes to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) program, including a registry participation requirement and adding “optometry” to the ophthalmology specialty set.
While CMS previously allowed doctors to meet their Promoting Interoperability (PI) requirement on registry engagement by simply enrolling with a registry, the CMS now proposes requiring doctors to demonstrate that they are moving toward full production of data to a registry from one year to the next. This proposal does create a challenge for some doctors of optometry and the AOA believes the sudden change is inconsistent with the lack of progress that has been achieved in sending data across a myriad of EHRs to registries.
Additionally, the CMS proposed adding “optometry” to the title of the ophthalmology specialty set to create a combined new specialty set: Ophthalmology/Optometry. While specialty measure sets are not required to be reported by MIPS-participating doctors, they can be helpful for doctors to more easily identify measures that can be reported.
Telehealth services
The CMS proposes keeping CPT 92002 and 92004 on the Medicare Telehealth Covered Services List through 2023; however, the agency does not intend to permanently include these codes on the telehealth covered services list.
Further, the CMS indicates it does not plan to keep the telephone E/M codes on the Medicare Telehealth Services List after the end of the public health emergency (PHE) and the 151-day post-PHE extension period. The CMS plans to assign these telephone E/M visit codes (99441, 99442 and 99443) a “bundled” status after the end of the PHE and the 151-day extension period, and the CMS will post the RUC-recommended values for these codes.
2023 total allowed charges
Lastly, the CMS estimates that doctors of optometry will have total allowed charges of over $1.3 billion, whereas estimated allowed charges for 2022 amounted to $1.1 billion.
There will be a 60-day public comment period on this proposed rule that closes on Sept. 6, 2022. To share input or feedback into the AOA’s public comments for the proposed 2023 PFS, please contact president@aoa.org.