- 2025 code changes: What doctors of optometry need to know
- Introducing the new CMS G2211 code
- Coordination of benefits 3 takeaways for optometric billing practices
- Clearing up modifier confusion
- Payor Downcoding: What Is It and What Should You Do About It
- New noteworthy optometry codes
- Modifier -25: How to use it appropriately and avoid costly penalties
- 3 coding questions cracked
- CPT codes deleted in 2023—do you know what codes may be billed to replace them?
- Why Proper Documentation Is Vital
- Common coding questions answered
- How and when to code for social determinants of health
- Most asked coding questions: dilation
- What does COVID-19 PHE ending mean for telemedicine
- 2 points to keep in mind when patients decline dilation
- social determinants of health
- Can a doctor of optometry bill Medicare for a comprehensive eye exam and a procedure on the same day
- The future of audio-only reimbursement
- Coding conundrums solved
- 7 takeaways from the 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule
- Virtual check-in codes
- What your colleagues are asking about coding
- CMS releases 2023 Medicare PFS proposed rule
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System: What doctors should know
- Ask the coding experts
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System quality measures
- Coding for presbyopia eye drops
- CMS 2022 Medicare PFS decreases conversion factor sets new policy goals
- CMS releases information on Part B claims-based quality measure scoring for 2021
- Updated ICD-10 codes take effect October 1
- If it sounds too good to be true
- New EM codes
- What to do when a coding decision is made incorrectly
- 4 coding changes now in effect
- changes in 2021 to coding and documentation for evaluation and management services.
- AOA HPI provides coding benchmark data
- Appropriate use of modifier 25
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management services
- AOA Coding Experts gain AMA CPT appointments
- 2020 PFS changes for optometry
- 2020 updates to the ICD-10 code set
- Medicares virtual check-in codes
- The importance of accurate coding and contact lens safety
- coding for cognitive development test
- Medicare evaluation and management documentation and billing
- Coding and audits
- 5 coding queries cracked
- appropriate diagnosis code reporting
- Diagnostic code changes
- 4 coding conundrums clarified
- Where coding and coverage intersect
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management documentation and reimbursement
- Global period data collection and possible future changes
- New ICD-10 codes effective
- July-Aug17_Coding Q&As
- The ICD 10 code development process
- coding experts-billing for post-cataract glasses
- accurate coding for public health
- July Aug 2017 Coding Experts
- September Coding Experts
- CMS data collection on postoperative visits
- 3 solutions to common coding problems
- 3 coding changes doctors need to know
- Coding cases cracked
- New diabetes related diagnosis codes
- Get answers to your coding questions
- New ICD10 codes doctors need to know
- Be aware of changes for 2017 and beyond
- Common coding Qs answered
- Coverage indications limitations and medical necessity
- 4 tips for competing with online retailers
- Coding questions cracked
- Access online coding resource for AOA members
- What is the future of CPT coding
- CMS makes changes in how doctors revalidate Medicare enrollment information
- 5 coding changes and clarifications doctors need to know
- More ICD 10 coding Q&As
- Doctors of optometry could see a rise in labor costs under new federal overtime rule
- 4 tips for growing your practice
- HHS unveils proposed rule for new Quality Payment Program
- Ask the Coding Experts Comparative billing reports raise questions on glaucoma patient treatment and coding
- Ask the Coding Experts Modifier 24 and 25 usage
- ICD-10 coding QandAs October
- Ask the Coding Experts Chronic care management services
- ICD 10 transition So far so good
- CMS comparative billing reports What you need to know
- Ready resources for the ICD 10 rollout
- Coding Q&As
- Online payment option makes cents
- Modifiers for distinct procedural services
- Get a refresher on your public Open Payments data
- Final countdown Get answers to your ICD-10 coding questions
- AOA clarifies meaningful use rule on electronic order entry
- More ICD 10 coding QandAs
- Vision therapy coding
- Medicare claims and requests for additional documentation
- Coding QnAs May
- Referring ordering and form 8550
- Reporting code 92250
- One-year Medicare payment fix extends ICD-10 deadline
Coding and contact lens safety
March 8, 2022
It is essential to appropriately code incidents related to contact lens problems.
Written by AOA’s Coding and Reimbursement Committee. Excerpted from page 44 of the January/February 2022 edition of AOA Focus.
While contact lenses are a safe and effective vision correction tool for millions of Americans, appropriate physician oversight is critical.
Over the past few years, new online apps have been marketed to consumers, purporting to assess the appropriate power and fit of a contact lens without actually viewing and evaluating the contact lens on the eye of the customer. It is important that efforts be made to best understand how these changes may be impacting patient safety.
In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published the report “Estimated Burden of Keratitis—United States, 2010.” The report concluded that annually there are nearly 1 million emergency room and urgent doctor visits and about $175 million is added to health care costs arising from keratitis linked to improper contact lens use. In the CDC report, it was noted that “the estimated prevalence of visits for keratitis-related diagnostic codes is likely to be an underestimate, because the datasets used in this analysis capture few visits to optometrists.” The CDC report also noted that “increased surveillance capacity is needed for microbial keratitis, in particular data from optometrist visits.”
To help with better tracking at the federal level through insurance reporting, it is essential that doctors are appropriately coding patient incidents that are directly related to contact lens problems. In 2021, an adverse event code was added for contact lens complications: Y77.11.
Y77.11 is defined as “Contact lens associated with adverse incidents; rigid gas permeable contact lens associated with adverse incidents; soft (hydrophilic) contact lens associated with adverse incidents.”
Using this adverse impact code is important to better track ocular complications that are a direct result of contact lenses. Tracking these complications will aid in combating the illegal and over-the-counter sale of contact lenses. Please be sure to append them to the claim following the appropriate diagnostic code that describes the pathology.
In addition to the Y code to report adverse events, the following is an overview of the diagnosis codes that can be used to accurately report when an eye injury is related to contact lens use:
- H18.211 Corneal edema secondary to contact lens, right eye
- H18.212 Corneal edema secondary to contact lens, left eye
- H18.213 Corneal edema secondary to contact lens, bilateral
- H18.821 Corneal disorder due to contact lens, right eye
- H18.822 Corneal disorder due to contact lens, left eye
- H18.823 Corneal disorder due to contact lens, bilateral
- H16.00 (1,2,3,9) Unspecified corneal ulcer
- H16.04 (1,2,3,9) Marginal corneal ulcer
- H16.40 (1,2,3,9) Unspecified corneal neovascularization
Additionally, keratitis should be reported with the H16 code series on the same claim line.
- H16.10 Unspecified superficial keratitis
H16.101 ...... right eye
H16.102 ...... left eye
H16.103 ...... bilateral - H16.11 Macular keratitis
H16.111 ...... right eye
H16.112 ...... left eye
H16.113 ...... bilateral - H16.12 Filamentary keratitis
H16.121 ...... right eye
H16.122 ...... left eye
H16.123 ...... bilateral - H16.14 Punctate keratitis
H16.141 ...... right eye
H16.142 ...... left eye
H16.143 ...... bilateral - H16.32 Diffuse interstitial keratitis
H16.321 ....... right eye
H16.322 ........ left eye
H16.323 ........ bilateral