- 2025 code changes: What doctors of optometry need to know
- Introducing the new CMS G2211 code
- Coordination of benefits 3 takeaways for optometric billing practices
- Clearing up modifier confusion
- Payor Downcoding: What Is It and What Should You Do About It
- New noteworthy optometry codes
- Modifier -25: How to use it appropriately and avoid costly penalties
- 3 coding questions cracked
- CPT codes deleted in 2023—do you know what codes may be billed to replace them?
- Why Proper Documentation Is Vital
- Common coding questions answered
- How and when to code for social determinants of health
- Most asked coding questions: dilation
- What does COVID-19 PHE ending mean for telemedicine
- 2 points to keep in mind when patients decline dilation
- social determinants of health
- Can a doctor of optometry bill Medicare for a comprehensive eye exam and a procedure on the same day
- The future of audio-only reimbursement
- Coding conundrums solved
- 7 takeaways from the 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule
- Virtual check-in codes
- What your colleagues are asking about coding
- CMS releases 2023 Medicare PFS proposed rule
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System: What doctors should know
- Ask the coding experts
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System quality measures
- Coding for presbyopia eye drops
- Coding and contact lens safety
- CMS 2022 Medicare PFS decreases conversion factor sets new policy goals
- CMS releases information on Part B claims-based quality measure scoring for 2021
- Updated ICD-10 codes take effect October 1
- If it sounds too good to be true
- New EM codes
- What to do when a coding decision is made incorrectly
- 4 coding changes now in effect
- changes in 2021 to coding and documentation for evaluation and management services.
- AOA HPI provides coding benchmark data
- Appropriate use of modifier 25
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management services
- AOA Coding Experts gain AMA CPT appointments
- 2020 PFS changes for optometry
- 2020 updates to the ICD-10 code set
- Medicares virtual check-in codes
- The importance of accurate coding and contact lens safety
- coding for cognitive development test
- Medicare evaluation and management documentation and billing
- Coding and audits
- 5 coding queries cracked
- appropriate diagnosis code reporting
- Diagnostic code changes
- 4 coding conundrums clarified
- Where coding and coverage intersect
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management documentation and reimbursement
- Global period data collection and possible future changes
- New ICD-10 codes effective
- July-Aug17_Coding Q&As
- The ICD 10 code development process
- coding experts-billing for post-cataract glasses
- accurate coding for public health
- July Aug 2017 Coding Experts
- September Coding Experts
- CMS data collection on postoperative visits
- 3 solutions to common coding problems
- 3 coding changes doctors need to know
- Coding cases cracked
- New diabetes related diagnosis codes
- Get answers to your coding questions
- New ICD10 codes doctors need to know
- Be aware of changes for 2017 and beyond
- Common coding Qs answered
- Coverage indications limitations and medical necessity
- 4 tips for competing with online retailers
- Coding questions cracked
- Access online coding resource for AOA members
- What is the future of CPT coding
- CMS makes changes in how doctors revalidate Medicare enrollment information
- 5 coding changes and clarifications doctors need to know
- More ICD 10 coding Q&As
- Doctors of optometry could see a rise in labor costs under new federal overtime rule
- 4 tips for growing your practice
- Ask the Coding Experts Comparative billing reports raise questions on glaucoma patient treatment and coding
- Ask the Coding Experts Modifier 24 and 25 usage
- ICD-10 coding QandAs October
- Ask the Coding Experts Chronic care management services
- ICD 10 transition So far so good
- CMS comparative billing reports What you need to know
- Ready resources for the ICD 10 rollout
- Coding Q&As
- Online payment option makes cents
- Modifiers for distinct procedural services
- Get a refresher on your public Open Payments data
- Final countdown Get answers to your ICD-10 coding questions
- AOA clarifies meaningful use rule on electronic order entry
- More ICD 10 coding QandAs
- Vision therapy coding
- Medicare claims and requests for additional documentation
- Coding QnAs May
- Referring ordering and form 8550
- Reporting code 92250
- One-year Medicare payment fix extends ICD-10 deadline
HHS unveils proposed rule for new Quality Payment Program
May 12, 2016
New CMS payment system combines aspects of meaningful use, PQRS and Value-Based Modifier programs. Changes could start as early as 2017.
Representing an outright paradigm shift in quality reporting and payment programs, the highly anticipated proposed rule implementing the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) emphasizes a streamlined approach to measures reporting.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking on April 27 that outlined agency plans to "align and modernize" Medicare payments after MACRA ousted the Medicare sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula. Collectively, these changes created the Quality Payment Program (QPP), which is divided into two paths that link to quality payments:
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)
- Alternative Payment Models (APMs)
MIPS is the QPP path that most doctors of optometry will utilize. It consolidates components of the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), the Value-based Modifier (VBM) and Medicare EHR Incentive Program (meaningful use) into one program focused on quality, resource use, and continued certified EHR technology (CEHRT) use. Medicare physician payments will continue to be based on the fee schedule, but larger bonuses and penalties will be possible under the new approach.
"This is the new system. This is the way of the future, and it started already with some of these programs," said Jeff Michaels, O.D., AOA Quality Improvement and Registries Committee chair, during a MIPS continuing education (CE) course at AOA's Congressional Advocacy Conference.
MACRA was created to push the needle toward high-quality, high-value care. Depending on how well physicians perform under MACRA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will start increasing or decreasing Medicare payments up to 4% in January 2020. The potential maximum incentive or penalty will increase each year from 2019 to 2022 and will cap at 9% in 2022 and on. Top performers may be rewarded with incentives above the maximum set rate.
The actual amount a doctors' Medicare payments will be adjusted to will be based on performance across four categories: Quality, Advancing Care Information, Clinical Practice Improvement Activities and Cost, Dr. Michaels explained. These categories will be factored as such:
- Quality - 50% of total score in first year. CMS has proposed that doctors choose to report six quality measures. The available measures for doctors of optometry to report will be similar to those found in PQRS.
- Advancing Care Information/Meaningful Use of CEHRT - 25% of total score in first year. CMS has proposed that doctors report on many of the same measures and objectives that currently exist under the EHR Incentive Program, but CMS would move away from the all-or-nothing method of evaluating successful participation. Therefore, partial credit is available for those who do not fully meet these measures.
- Clinical Practice Improvement - 15% of total score in first year. CMS has proposed that doctors would select activities that match their practices' goals from a list of more than 90 options, rewarding activities focused on care coordination, beneficiary engagement, and patient safety.
- Cost/Resource Use - 10% of total score in first year. CMS has proposed for this measure to be based on Medicare claims, meaning no additional reporting requirements for clinicians, but physicians would be evaluated on how they compare to their peers related to health care costs.
These factors change over time to the point that Quality accounts for only 30% of the total score, while Cost/Resource Use increases to 30% by 2022, Dr. Michaels said. In the meantime, CMS intends to begin measuring doctors' performance through MIPS in 2017, and payments would begin in 2019.
AOA will be offering substantive comments on the proposed rule before the June 27, 2016, deadline to help ensure there are pathways to success for doctors of optometry under this new payment system.
Importance of registry use
AOA MORE (Measures and Outcomes Registry for Eyecare) by Prometheus Research has already proven to be a valuable resource for meeting meaningful use and PQRS measures. The registry recently received CMS' Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) designation for the 2016 PQRS year. However, AOA MORE will become absolutely critical to doctors of optometry under MIPS. MACRA and the new proposed rule give special consideration to QCDRs and encourage their use as a way to increase reimbursement and reduce burden under MIPS.