- New Demodex blepharitis codes available for optometrists
- Ask the Coding Experts
- The key to deflecting downcoding? Diagnosis code reporting
- 2025 code changes: What doctors of optometry need to know
- Introducing the new CMS G2211 code
- Coordination of benefits 3 takeaways for optometric billing practices
- Clearing up modifier confusion
- Payor Downcoding: What Is It and What Should You Do About It
- New noteworthy optometry codes
- Modifier -25: How to use it appropriately and avoid costly penalties
- 3 coding questions cracked
- CPT codes deleted in 2023—do you know what codes may be billed to replace them?
- Why Proper Documentation Is Vital
- Common coding questions answered
- How and when to code for social determinants of health
- Most asked coding questions: dilation
- What does COVID-19 PHE ending mean for telemedicine
- 2 points to keep in mind when patients decline dilation
- social determinants of health
- Can a doctor of optometry bill Medicare for a comprehensive eye exam and a procedure on the same day
- The future of audio-only reimbursement
- Coding conundrums solved
- 7 takeaways from the 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule
- Virtual check-in codes
- What your colleagues are asking about coding
- CMS releases 2023 Medicare PFS proposed rule
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System: What doctors should know
- Ask the coding experts
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System quality measures
- Coding for presbyopia eye drops
- Coding and contact lens safety
- CMS 2022 Medicare PFS decreases conversion factor sets new policy goals
- CMS releases information on Part B claims-based quality measure scoring for 2021
- Updated ICD-10 codes take effect October 1
- If it sounds too good to be true
- New EM codes
- What to do when a coding decision is made incorrectly
- 4 coding changes now in effect
- changes in 2021 to coding and documentation for evaluation and management services.
- AOA HPI provides coding benchmark data
- Appropriate use of modifier 25
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management services
- AOA Coding Experts gain AMA CPT appointments
- 2020 PFS changes for optometry
- 2020 updates to the ICD-10 code set
- Medicares virtual check-in codes
- The importance of accurate coding and contact lens safety
- coding for cognitive development test
- Medicare evaluation and management documentation and billing
- Coding and audits
- 5 coding queries cracked
- appropriate diagnosis code reporting
- Diagnostic code changes
- 4 coding conundrums clarified
- Where coding and coverage intersect
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management documentation and reimbursement
- Global period data collection and possible future changes
- New ICD-10 codes effective
- July-Aug17_Coding Q&As
- The ICD 10 code development process
- coding experts-billing for post-cataract glasses
- accurate coding for public health
- September Coding Experts
- CMS data collection on postoperative visits
- 3 solutions to common coding problems
- 3 coding changes doctors need to know
- Coding cases cracked
- New diabetes related diagnosis codes
- Get answers to your coding questions
- New ICD10 codes doctors need to know
- Be aware of changes for 2017 and beyond
- Common coding Qs answered
- Coverage indications limitations and medical necessity
- 4 tips for competing with online retailers
- Coding questions cracked
- Access online coding resource for AOA members
- What is the future of CPT coding
- CMS makes changes in how doctors revalidate Medicare enrollment information
- 5 coding changes and clarifications doctors need to know
- More ICD 10 coding Q&As
- Doctors of optometry could see a rise in labor costs under new federal overtime rule
- 4 tips for growing your practice
- HHS unveils proposed rule for new Quality Payment Program
- Ask the Coding Experts Comparative billing reports raise questions on glaucoma patient treatment and coding
- Ask the Coding Experts Modifier 24 and 25 usage
- ICD-10 coding QandAs October
- Ask the Coding Experts Chronic care management services
- ICD 10 transition So far so good
- CMS comparative billing reports What you need to know
- Ready resources for the ICD 10 rollout
- Coding Q&As
- Online payment option makes cents
- Modifiers for distinct procedural services
- Get a refresher on your public Open Payments data
- Final countdown Get answers to your ICD-10 coding questions
- AOA clarifies meaningful use rule on electronic order entry
- More ICD 10 coding QandAs
- Vision therapy coding
- Medicare claims and requests for additional documentation
- Coding QnAs May
- Referring ordering and form 8550
- Reporting code 92250
- One-year Medicare payment fix extends ICD-10 deadline
How high copays impact your practice
August 24, 2017
Physicians sometimes struggle with how to collect the appropriate payment amount from the patient.
Ask the Coding Experts, by Doug Morrow, O.D., Harvey Richman, O.D., Rebecca Wartman, O.D. Excerpted from page 44 of the July/August 2017 edition of AOA Focus.
As doctors, we know that the health care insurance landscape has been changing for some time, and in many cases patients are paying increasingly more out of pocket for health care costs. The Kaiser Family Foundation found that the average deductible for people with employer-provided health coverage rose from $303 to $1,077 between 2006 and 2015.
In addition to patient deductibles, patients also are responsible for their copayments at each visit, and nearly 68% of patients with employer-sponsored health insurance have a copayment requirement.
Copayment levels can widely vary. For plans sold on the marketplace, copayments can range from $30-$60. Some patients may have even higher copayment requirements.
For patients with very high copayments, doctors may experience occasions when the fees for the services provided to the patient are actually less than the copayment amount. For example, if a patient returns for follow-up care and monitoring and you perform an OCT (CPT 92134), the fee for this service in some areas of the country may be as low as $39.89, according to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.
In these situations, many physicians struggle with how to collect the appropriate payment amount from the patient. Typically, insurance companies will require that the copayment be collected in full regardless of the fees associated with the services provided. However, you may verify with the patient's insurance company to determine your contractual obligation to collect the full copayment amount, if concerned.
For your Medicare patients, it is even more critical that copayments be collected for every patient. The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) issued guidance several years ago on the routine waiver of copayments and found that this practice raises significant concerns. The OIG indicated that waiving Medicare copayments could be interpreted as the physician misrepresenting his or her charges for services. If a physician indicates that his or her charge for a service is $100, but the physician waives the Medicare copayment, the actual charge is $80. If the true charge of the service is $80, the OIG has indicated that Medicare should actually be reimbursing 80% of that amount, rather than 80% of $100.
The OIG also cautioned against waiving copayments because that action could be construed as a violation of the Medicare and Medicaid anti-kickback statute [42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b(b)]. If a physician waives a copayment for a patient, the physician may be inducing that patient to purchase items or services from the doctor. It would be allowable to waive a copayment in cases in which the patient has true financial hardship, but this should not be routine; doctors should have specific policies in place for waiving copayments due to financial hardship, and the reasons for a copayment waiver should be appropriately documented in the case of an audit or inquiry.