- 2025 code changes: What doctors of optometry need to know
- Introducing the new CMS G2211 code
- Coordination of benefits 3 takeaways for optometric billing practices
- Clearing up modifier confusion
- Payor Downcoding: What Is It and What Should You Do About It
- New noteworthy optometry codes
- Modifier -25: How to use it appropriately and avoid costly penalties
- 3 coding questions cracked
- CPT codes deleted in 2023—do you know what codes may be billed to replace them?
- Why Proper Documentation Is Vital
- Common coding questions answered
- How and when to code for social determinants of health
- Most asked coding questions: dilation
- What does COVID-19 PHE ending mean for telemedicine
- 2 points to keep in mind when patients decline dilation
- social determinants of health
- Can a doctor of optometry bill Medicare for a comprehensive eye exam and a procedure on the same day
- The future of audio-only reimbursement
- Coding conundrums solved
- 7 takeaways from the 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule
- Virtual check-in codes
- What your colleagues are asking about coding
- CMS releases 2023 Medicare PFS proposed rule
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System: What doctors should know
- Ask the coding experts
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System quality measures
- Coding for presbyopia eye drops
- Coding and contact lens safety
- CMS 2022 Medicare PFS decreases conversion factor sets new policy goals
- CMS releases information on Part B claims-based quality measure scoring for 2021
- Updated ICD-10 codes take effect October 1
- If it sounds too good to be true
- New EM codes
- What to do when a coding decision is made incorrectly
- 4 coding changes now in effect
- changes in 2021 to coding and documentation for evaluation and management services.
- AOA HPI provides coding benchmark data
- Appropriate use of modifier 25
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management services
- AOA Coding Experts gain AMA CPT appointments
- 2020 PFS changes for optometry
- 2020 updates to the ICD-10 code set
- Medicares virtual check-in codes
- The importance of accurate coding and contact lens safety
- coding for cognitive development test
- Medicare evaluation and management documentation and billing
- Coding and audits
- 5 coding queries cracked
- appropriate diagnosis code reporting
- Diagnostic code changes
- 4 coding conundrums clarified
- Where coding and coverage intersect
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management documentation and reimbursement
- Global period data collection and possible future changes
- New ICD-10 codes effective
- July-Aug17_Coding Q&As
- The ICD 10 code development process
- coding experts-billing for post-cataract glasses
- accurate coding for public health
- July Aug 2017 Coding Experts
- September Coding Experts
- CMS data collection on postoperative visits
- 3 solutions to common coding problems
- 3 coding changes doctors need to know
- Coding cases cracked
- New diabetes related diagnosis codes
- Get answers to your coding questions
- New ICD10 codes doctors need to know
- Be aware of changes for 2017 and beyond
- Common coding Qs answered
- Coverage indications limitations and medical necessity
- 4 tips for competing with online retailers
- Coding questions cracked
- Access online coding resource for AOA members
- What is the future of CPT coding
- CMS makes changes in how doctors revalidate Medicare enrollment information
- 5 coding changes and clarifications doctors need to know
- More ICD 10 coding Q&As
- Doctors of optometry could see a rise in labor costs under new federal overtime rule
- 4 tips for growing your practice
- HHS unveils proposed rule for new Quality Payment Program
- Ask the Coding Experts Comparative billing reports raise questions on glaucoma patient treatment and coding
- Ask the Coding Experts Modifier 24 and 25 usage
- ICD-10 coding QandAs October
- Ask the Coding Experts Chronic care management services
- ICD 10 transition So far so good
- CMS comparative billing reports What you need to know
- Ready resources for the ICD 10 rollout
- Coding Q&As
- Online payment option makes cents
- Modifiers for distinct procedural services
- Get a refresher on your public Open Payments data
- Final countdown Get answers to your ICD-10 coding questions
- AOA clarifies meaningful use rule on electronic order entry
- More ICD 10 coding QandAs
- Vision therapy coding
- Coding QnAs May
- Referring ordering and form 8550
- Reporting code 92250
- One-year Medicare payment fix extends ICD-10 deadline
Medicare claims and requests for additional documentation
July 13, 2015
You must respond to any requests for records.
Ask the Coding Experts, by Doug Morrow, O.D., Harvey Richman, O.D., and Rebecca Wartman, O.D. From the June 2015 edition of AOA Focus, page 48.
In a recent review of Railroad Medicare Evaluation and Management (E&M) claims, Palmetto GBA, a Medicare contractor, had an overall claims denial rate of 54.6%. This particular review included claims for codes 99215 and 99233 (subsequent hospital care). Of the 7,545 claims reviewed, 4,766 were coded using the 99215 E&M code, and 2,650 of these claims denied netting a 54.7% denial rate on just the office visit claims.
One of the most alarming reasons for the high denial rate was a lack of provider response to the record requests, which are called Additional Documentation Requests (ADR). Providers failed to respond to the ADR an incredible 72% of the time. This failure to respond means the claims are being automatically denied.
Of the responses, approximately 12% of the claims reviewed had insufficient or incomplete documentation. Lack of signature represented 2% of those denials while approximately 10% of the claims lacked some of the record documentation elements required for the level of examination billed.
Providers are required to place a "signature for each entry which is legible and includes the provider's first and last name." Denials for lack of signature ranged from no signature to illegible signatures to illegal signatures (initials only, for example). Providers have several options for signing documentation ranging from a legal, legible signature to a signature attestation document attached when the claim is submitted.
As we have said time and again, complete documentation is required for all medical records. In the event of an ADR or a record audit, you may not change the record but can add addendums that are clearly dated and signed so a reviewer can easily determine when the information was added. Per Medicare, "All entries in the medical record must be dated, timed and authenticated, in written or electronic form, by the person responsible for providing or evaluating the service provided." If the record is not complete and does not meet the documentation guidelines for the level of service billed, the claim will be denied.
Medicare and private third-party payers across the country have expressed concern about the lack of response to the ADR. Medicare has directed the carriers to continue service-specific claims reviews to ensure that services are properly documented and support medical necessity. Providers should respond quickly when records are requested, as they are often time specific in the inquiry. This type of particular "service-specific" probe will be continued due to the high denial rate caused mainly by the lack of provider response. Providers are advised that they can respond using one of several options: mail, fax and electronic submission. Medicare Carrier websites and the ADR will have specific instructions on response options. To summarize, sign your claims, complete your documentation, but most importantly, you must respond to any requests for records.