- 2025 code changes: What doctors of optometry need to know
- Introducing the new CMS G2211 code
- Coordination of benefits 3 takeaways for optometric billing practices
- Clearing up modifier confusion
- Payor Downcoding: What Is It and What Should You Do About It
- New noteworthy optometry codes
- Modifier -25: How to use it appropriately and avoid costly penalties
- 3 coding questions cracked
- CPT codes deleted in 2023—do you know what codes may be billed to replace them?
- Why Proper Documentation Is Vital
- Common coding questions answered
- How and when to code for social determinants of health
- Most asked coding questions: dilation
- What does COVID-19 PHE ending mean for telemedicine
- 2 points to keep in mind when patients decline dilation
- social determinants of health
- Can a doctor of optometry bill Medicare for a comprehensive eye exam and a procedure on the same day
- The future of audio-only reimbursement
- Coding conundrums solved
- 7 takeaways from the 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule
- Virtual check-in codes
- What your colleagues are asking about coding
- CMS releases 2023 Medicare PFS proposed rule
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System: What doctors should know
- Ask the coding experts
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System quality measures
- Coding for presbyopia eye drops
- Coding and contact lens safety
- CMS 2022 Medicare PFS decreases conversion factor sets new policy goals
- CMS releases information on Part B claims-based quality measure scoring for 2021
- Updated ICD-10 codes take effect October 1
- If it sounds too good to be true
- New EM codes
- What to do when a coding decision is made incorrectly
- 4 coding changes now in effect
- changes in 2021 to coding and documentation for evaluation and management services.
- AOA HPI provides coding benchmark data
- Appropriate use of modifier 25
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management services
- AOA Coding Experts gain AMA CPT appointments
- 2020 PFS changes for optometry
- 2020 updates to the ICD-10 code set
- Medicares virtual check-in codes
- The importance of accurate coding and contact lens safety
- coding for cognitive development test
- Medicare evaluation and management documentation and billing
- Coding and audits
- 5 coding queries cracked
- appropriate diagnosis code reporting
- Diagnostic code changes
- 4 coding conundrums clarified
- Where coding and coverage intersect
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management documentation and reimbursement
- Global period data collection and possible future changes
- New ICD-10 codes effective
- July-Aug17_Coding Q&As
- The ICD 10 code development process
- coding experts-billing for post-cataract glasses
- accurate coding for public health
- July Aug 2017 Coding Experts
- September Coding Experts
- CMS data collection on postoperative visits
- 3 solutions to common coding problems
- 3 coding changes doctors need to know
- Coding cases cracked
- New diabetes related diagnosis codes
- Get answers to your coding questions
- New ICD10 codes doctors need to know
- Be aware of changes for 2017 and beyond
- Common coding Qs answered
- Coverage indications limitations and medical necessity
- 4 tips for competing with online retailers
- Coding questions cracked
- Access online coding resource for AOA members
- What is the future of CPT coding
- CMS makes changes in how doctors revalidate Medicare enrollment information
- 5 coding changes and clarifications doctors need to know
- More ICD 10 coding Q&As
- Doctors of optometry could see a rise in labor costs under new federal overtime rule
- 4 tips for growing your practice
- HHS unveils proposed rule for new Quality Payment Program
- Ask the Coding Experts Comparative billing reports raise questions on glaucoma patient treatment and coding
- Ask the Coding Experts Modifier 24 and 25 usage
- ICD-10 coding QandAs October
- Ask the Coding Experts Chronic care management services
- ICD 10 transition So far so good
- CMS comparative billing reports What you need to know
- Ready resources for the ICD 10 rollout
- Coding Q&As
- Online payment option makes cents
- Modifiers for distinct procedural services
- Get a refresher on your public Open Payments data
- Final countdown Get answers to your ICD-10 coding questions
- AOA clarifies meaningful use rule on electronic order entry
- More ICD 10 coding QandAs
- Vision therapy coding
- Medicare claims and requests for additional documentation
- Coding QnAs May
- Referring ordering and form 8550
- One-year Medicare payment fix extends ICD-10 deadline
Reporting code 92250
April 14, 2015
Is it appropriate to report scanning laser ophthalmoscopy technology when it’s used to produce fundus photographs?
From the April 2015 edition of AOA Focus, page 50.
There has been some confusion regarding the appropriate reporting of code 92250, as recommended in the April 1999 issue of the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) Assistant newsletter. The Coding Experts would like to clarify whether it is appropriate to report scanning laser ophthalmoscopy technology when it is used to produce fundus photographs.
Prior to 2014, according to CPT Assistant, it was not appropriate to assign CPT code 92250 for scanning laser fundus technology (CPT code 92135). It stated that CPT code 92250, fundus photography with interpretation and report, which describes generation of a retinal image only and no data generation, would be appropriately assigned for this procedure. CPT based its opinion on code 92135 (scanning computerized ophthalmic diagnostic imaging [SCODI], posterior segment, [e.g., scanning laser] with interpretation and report, unilateral) being used to describe a method of objective measurement involving a quantitative determination of the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber. The computer analysis of the measurement data was placed in a database file to allow future comparison of the patient information at follow-up examinations.
As ophthalmic diagnostic imaging technology advanced over the years, two new codes—92133 (SCODI, posterior segment, with interpretation and report, unilateral or bilateral; optic nerve) and 92134 (SCODI, posterior segment, with interpretation and report, unilateral or bilateral; retina)—were created in the 2011 CPT code set to replace deleted code 92135.
In 2013, a Medicare Part B contractor further confused the situation by stating that fundus photography uses a special camera to photograph structures behind the lens of the eye, including vitreous, retina, choroid and optic nerve. It specifically stated that this procedure does not include laser scanning of the retina.
But, as of November 2014, CPT Assistant clarified that if the scanner produces an image of the retina or optic nerve along with other data and imaging for quantitative analysis, it would be appropriate to report a single service from the appropriate SCODI range (92133-92134). If only an image is obtained, then code 92250 would be reported, it stated.
It further clarifies that if the only necessary service provided is generating a fundus image without the need to quantify the nerve fiber layer thickness and to analyze the data via a computer, then reporting code 92250 is appropriate, even if the image was taken with a scanning laser.
Just one month later, in December 2014, CPT addressed another component to the use of new technologies using retinal imaging. Specifically, it describes a situation when an ophthalmologic photographer takes fundus autofluorescent images without the need for intravenous fluorescein or indocyanine green dye. The article reports code 92250 would be reported either as part of a series of fundus images or as a stand-alone service. An analogous service provided by a doctor of optometry, obtaining red-free images at the time of color photography, is not coded separately.
To summarize, as stated several times over the past few months, ophthalmic technology is evolving more quickly than CPT can keep up. As these changes in coding guidance arise, we will keep you posted. But in the meantime, always check the carrier's policy to make sure that you are following correctly.