- 2025 code changes: What doctors of optometry need to know
- Introducing the new CMS G2211 code
- Coordination of benefits 3 takeaways for optometric billing practices
- Clearing up modifier confusion
- Payor Downcoding: What Is It and What Should You Do About It
- New noteworthy optometry codes
- Modifier -25: How to use it appropriately and avoid costly penalties
- 3 coding questions cracked
- CPT codes deleted in 2023—do you know what codes may be billed to replace them?
- Why Proper Documentation Is Vital
- Common coding questions answered
- How and when to code for social determinants of health
- Most asked coding questions: dilation
- What does COVID-19 PHE ending mean for telemedicine
- 2 points to keep in mind when patients decline dilation
- social determinants of health
- Can a doctor of optometry bill Medicare for a comprehensive eye exam and a procedure on the same day
- The future of audio-only reimbursement
- Coding conundrums solved
- 7 takeaways from the 2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule
- Virtual check-in codes
- What your colleagues are asking about coding
- CMS releases 2023 Medicare PFS proposed rule
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System: What doctors should know
- Ask the coding experts
- Merit-based Incentive Payment System quality measures
- Coding for presbyopia eye drops
- Coding and contact lens safety
- CMS 2022 Medicare PFS decreases conversion factor sets new policy goals
- CMS releases information on Part B claims-based quality measure scoring for 2021
- Updated ICD-10 codes take effect October 1
- If it sounds too good to be true
- New EM codes
- What to do when a coding decision is made incorrectly
- 4 coding changes now in effect
- changes in 2021 to coding and documentation for evaluation and management services.
- AOA HPI provides coding benchmark data
- Appropriate use of modifier 25
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management services
- AOA Coding Experts gain AMA CPT appointments
- 2020 PFS changes for optometry
- 2020 updates to the ICD-10 code set
- Medicares virtual check-in codes
- The importance of accurate coding and contact lens safety
- coding for cognitive development test
- Medicare evaluation and management documentation and billing
- Coding and audits
- 5 coding queries cracked
- appropriate diagnosis code reporting
- Diagnostic code changes
- 4 coding conundrums clarified
- Where coding and coverage intersect
- Changes on the horizon for evaluation and management documentation and reimbursement
- Global period data collection and possible future changes
- New ICD-10 codes effective
- July-Aug17_Coding Q&As
- The ICD 10 code development process
- coding experts-billing for post-cataract glasses
- accurate coding for public health
- July Aug 2017 Coding Experts
- CMS data collection on postoperative visits
- 3 solutions to common coding problems
- 3 coding changes doctors need to know
- Coding cases cracked
- New diabetes related diagnosis codes
- Get answers to your coding questions
- New ICD10 codes doctors need to know
- Be aware of changes for 2017 and beyond
- Common coding Qs answered
- Coverage indications limitations and medical necessity
- 4 tips for competing with online retailers
- Coding questions cracked
- Access online coding resource for AOA members
- What is the future of CPT coding
- CMS makes changes in how doctors revalidate Medicare enrollment information
- 5 coding changes and clarifications doctors need to know
- More ICD 10 coding Q&As
- Doctors of optometry could see a rise in labor costs under new federal overtime rule
- 4 tips for growing your practice
- HHS unveils proposed rule for new Quality Payment Program
- Ask the Coding Experts Comparative billing reports raise questions on glaucoma patient treatment and coding
- Ask the Coding Experts Modifier 24 and 25 usage
- ICD-10 coding QandAs October
- Ask the Coding Experts Chronic care management services
- ICD 10 transition So far so good
- CMS comparative billing reports What you need to know
- Ready resources for the ICD 10 rollout
- Coding Q&As
- Online payment option makes cents
- Modifiers for distinct procedural services
- Get a refresher on your public Open Payments data
- Final countdown Get answers to your ICD-10 coding questions
- AOA clarifies meaningful use rule on electronic order entry
- More ICD 10 coding QandAs
- Vision therapy coding
- Medicare claims and requests for additional documentation
- Coding QnAs May
- Referring ordering and form 8550
- Reporting code 92250
- One-year Medicare payment fix extends ICD-10 deadline
AOA member surveys impact Medicare valuations for services
October 11, 2017
The input AOA receives regarding the work and time spent performing various services directly impacts the recommendation AOA makes regarding a code’s potential value.
Excerpted from page 44 of the September 2017 edition of AOA Focus.
Many physicians may be unaware of the process that is used to develop values for procedures reimbursed under Medicare, and of the role that practicing physicians play in this important process.
The American Medical Association (AMA)/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) focuses exclusively on code values determining both the work involved and the office expense incurred in the delivery of a service to a patient. The RUC then offers recommendations to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding appropriate values for new or revised Current Procedural Terminology (CPT)© codes. All of medicine has a stake in this process.
This is a significant process as a service's valuation impacts how it ultimately is reimbursed under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. The AOA is fully engaged in this valuation process and has held a seat on the RUC Health Care Professionals Advisory Committee (HCPAC) since 1991. The AOA is represented at all RUC meetings and assists in the development of recommendations for CPT code values that doctors of optometry report.
All doctors of optometry also play an important role in how codes are valued. In order for AOA's RUC representatives to present values for RUC and CMS consideration, the AOA relies on data gathered from surveys disseminated to doctors of optometry. The input that the AOA receives regarding the work and time spent performing various services directly impacts the recommendation that AOA makes to the RUC regarding a code's potential value. As doctors of optometry and ophthalmologists provide many of the same services, when both specialties typically perform a specific service under review by the RUC, the survey process is coordinated alongside the American Academy of Ophthalmology to develop a consensus recommendation for presentation before the RUC.
Historically, doctor of optometry response rates on RUC surveys have been very low, even for procedures that are performed in large number by doctors of optometry. The AMA RUC has developed videos to educate physicians regarding the RUC process:
- Understanding the RUC Survey Instrument: Physician Services
- Understanding the RUC Survey Instrument: Surgical Services
The AOA anticipates that in 2017 and 2018, additional services provided by doctors of optometry will be required to be surveyed and values will need to be presented to the RUC. If you receive a survey and perform the service under review, it is critical to provide feedback and complete the survey. Your profession is depending on you!